We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Tue, Apr 3 2007 10:09 PM by Case Assigner. 0 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Case Assigner  +  346962 Tue, 03 Apr 07 10:09 PM

 

1)      Identify arguments and adjuncts in the following sentences. Discuss problematic examples.

 

Short explanation to my answers:

The important verb is written in bold letters, the selected arguments are underlined.

An adjunct is written in italics.

Theta roles are written in brackets.

 

a)      John has abandoned his family.

“has abandoned” has 2 arguments, namely “John” (agent) and “his family”(experiencer)    

 

John and Mary have abandoned their family.

                        The same is valid for this case, “have abandoned” selects as its arguments

                        “John and Mary” (agent) and “their family” (experiencer). 

 

b)     John encountered Mary in the park.

“Encountered” takes two arguments, the internal argument “Mary” (patient) and the external one, namely “John” ( agent ). “In the park” is an adjunct.

 

John met Mary in the park.

The same like the sentence above, only with the verb “met”.

 

John and Mary met in the park.

                        “In the park” is an adjunct. “John and Mary” occupy the same position here. I

think they aren´t agents, rather theme. There are two options: “met” turned from a transitive into an intransitive verb, or there is an empty category that contains a reflexive pronoun. I prefer the second alternative, but I am unsure about this assumption.

 

c)      Mary suddenly left the house at four thirty.

“left” selects “Mary” ( agent ) and “the house” ( location ) as its arguments. The rest are adjuncts.

 

After dinner, Mary left.

Here we have an intransitive version of leave, therefore we have “Mary” (agent) as the only selected argument. We find an adjunct before the comma.

 

 

 

d)     Soon after her departure, Mary found a job.

Again, at the beginning is an adjunct. “Found” selects “Mary” ( agent ) and “a job” ( theme ) as their arguments.

 

Mary found the job very interesting.

Here found selects “Mary” ( agent / experiencer ) and “the job very interesting” ( theme ) as their arguments.

 

Mary found her son another job.

                        I think that the two arguments are “Mary” ( agent ) and “another job” ( theme )

because we could paraphrase it as Mary found another job for her son.

 

e)      John called a taxi.

“Called” selects “John” ( agent ) and “a taxi” ( theme ) as its arguments.

 

They called him a taxi.

The same like in the sentence Mary found her son another job.

 

John called him a thief.

“John” is the agent here and “him a thief” is the theme.

Joined on Sun, Feb 25 2007
Germany
Junior Member 99
You found mistakes in my post? Please notify me :) Thx a lot.
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3614.32638. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.