[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Mon, Jul 20 2009 10:58 AM by Anonymous. 7 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Enchanted  +  827348 Mon, 20 Jul 09 09:13 AM
Hi, I am reading a passage. A is talking to B about C, whom he doesn't like. And he doesn't want to treat C special.


" Yes, he's making money. That's not the standard, it seems to me, one gauges a man's value to the sociaty. As for his oils(gasline), he'd come crawling to us, he's wait his turn along with all other shippers, and he wouldn't demand more than his fair share of transportation."



Why would used here?


thanks,


Ench

Joined on Thu, Jul 5 2007
Full Member 114
Enchanted
Mister Micawber  +  827351 Mon, 20 Jul 09 09:17 AM
He would if he needed or wanted toWould is conditional.
Joined on Wed, Aug 4 2004
Yokohama
Veteran Member 30,833
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master-- that's all.'
Enchanted  +  827370 Mon, 20 Jul 09 09:27 AM
Thanks, Mister MIC.

Why the word will isn't used? when you say conditinal, does it exclude using "will"?

Mister Micawber  +  827371 Mon, 20 Jul 09 09:28 AM
'Will' is excluded because the speaker does not know whether he will or not.  'Would' is Conditional II, present or future possibility.
Enchanted  +  827374 Mon, 20 Jul 09 09:37 AM
So here, it is nothing to do with politeness, right?

thanks again.

ench

Mister Micawber  +  827390 Mon, 20 Jul 09 09:49 AM
From what you have given us, I see no politeness involved.
Enchanted  +  827392 Mon, 20 Jul 09 09:57 AM
Thanks, Mica:

I just figured a foundamental thing in english grammer.

thanks to your help.

ench.

Anonymous, 129 days ago
would is used for the second and third person

 

ex: you would , he would

 

should the past tense of SHALL is used in the the first person

 

ex: i should. we should

 

though both are acceptable in using for the second and third person (should or would)

 

would cannot be mistakenly acceptable in replacement for should as the first person.

 

 

© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.