Not sure if this is the right thread; however, hope I'll find some help! ![Smile [:)]](/emoticons/emotion-1.gif)
I've been asked to choose some "poorly worded" sentences from postgraduate theses and rewrite them, explaining why they are wrong (I'm not cheating ... it's not an assignment and I won't be marked!)
---------------------------------
Example no.1 and edited version:
'During a hundred years, 150 traders had been reduced to less than 10 with approximately 20,000 square feet of redundant space and a further 25,000 square feet of unused cellars blighting the site.'
According to SOURCE (YEAR), the number of traders decreased from 150 to less than 10 in a hundred years, from YEAR1 to YEAR2. As a consequence, a space of approximately 20,000 square feet was redundant and a further 25,000 square feet of unused cellars blighted the site.’
---------------------------------
Example no.2 and edited version:
'Snowdonia National Park, located in Wales has a similar population to Dartmoor of 26,000, it also attracts around 6-10 million visitors a year yet covers 823 square miles compared to only 386 square miles of Dartmoor.'
According to the (YEAR) Census, Snowdonia National Park, located in Wales, has a population of 26,000 inhabitants, similar to the Dartmoor National Park's one (also in Wales). Figures from (SOURCE1) show that it attracts around 6-10 million visitors a year; yet, it covers 823 square miles compared to only 386 square miles of Dartmoor (data from SOURCE2).
---------------------------------
Are the editings correct? I'm not sure particularly about the 'yet' in the second example.
Thank you very much in advance!