Is America being run by psychopathis war criminals?

Here is a little background;

Former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal and former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury Dr. Paul Craig Roberts expressed his dire warning that the US government has fallen into the hands of psychopaths and that the Neo-Cons in the Bush administration may be set to stage another terror attack in the US as part of a black operation to demolish growing dissent and coerce the public to rally behind the government once again.

During an interview with the Alex Jones Show, Roberts cited a Capitol Hill Blue article concerning a leaked memo circulating between top Republican leaders.

The memo outlines potential strategies to bring their agenda back online, including the capture of Osama bin Laden, a drastic turnaround in the economy or a resolution of the war in Iraq.

The most alarming option includes a terrorist attack that would validate the President's war on terror and "restore his image as leader of he American people."

This document adds to the mountainous pile of smoking gun evidence of government complicity in staged terror attacks and other false flag operations. It has now been declassified, as we already knew, that the Gulf of Tonkin never happened. It was staged to get us into Vietnam. Operation Northwoods was the official US government plan to carry out 9/11 style attacks against the American people and blame it on foreign enemies as a pretext for war.

Publicly published PNAC documents before 9/11 had saliva stains all over them as Dick Cheney and others talked about helpful Pearl Harbor attacks.

Paul Craig Roberts

Roberts went further than he has ever gone before in stating that the Neo-Cons were worse than Hitler and Stalin because they publicly embrace torture and pre-emptive war, something that past despots at least tried to hide.

As the Senate bill to block torture is blocked by Bush and Cheney, the promotion of torture in official circles continues.

US National Security advisor Stephen Hadley refused to rule out torture in the case of an imminent attack, telling CNN's Late Edition that there are cases where the Bush administration's empty pledge not to torture would apply.

George Bush' repeated statements of "we do not torture" would certainly ring hollow to the thousands of disappeared individuals, now subject to God knows what in secret ex-Soviet gulag camps all over the Eastern Bloc.

And also to those subject to torture mastermind Donald Rumsfeld's Copper Green program, which manifested itself with arbitrary rape and fatal beatings at Camp X-ray and Abu Ghraib.

Paul Craig Roberts said that the US government is in the hands of dangerous psychopaths who are a disgrace to the human race and who should be arrested as war criminals and turned over the the Hague.

Roberts outlined his conviction that the torture program was not set up to gain any kind of real information from accused detainees because torture is renowned for extracting useless and false information. The real reason for the torture is to make the terrorists implicate themselves and thus create the perception of a real terrorist threat.

This is exactly the process in Uzbekistan, where the government was caught torturing innocent people into confession and then using the confessions as evidence that the government needed to crack down on terror.

Roberts said that the CIA was aware that the vast majority of detainees are not terrorists, proven by the fact that Pakistani gangsters admitted to rounding up innocent people in street sweeps and selling them to the US government as terrorists for anything up to $25,000. These people are now at Guantanamo Bay.

Roberts pointed out that only nine so-called terrorists have been brought to trial and none have been convicted. Why do individuals have to be held for four years without trial if there is proof that they can be convicted with? Army interrogators have gone public with their frustrations that these people are obviously not terrorists but they are still ordered to keep them. Images of mass ranks of terrorists are pure lies on the part of the insane Neo-Cons.

People who refuse to torture and blow the whistle on it, like General Janis Karpinsky and Rick Baccus are ejected and replaced with cadres of torture teams willing to do the dirty work. Roberts said that these torture teams would be turned loose on US citizens before long.

Roberts said that America is the most hated nation on earth by design and that the military is completely out of control. The barbarism in Iraq practiced by the US occupational government will live in infamy when it is historically judged by hindsight.

Paul Craig Roberts has an impressive resume.( rez-uu-may or rez-oomay)  My immediate thought is "What's in it for him?" Does he have a personal axe to grind? Is he the flip side to Ann Coulter?  He seems to be doing very nicely with his emotional rhetoric!

The truth is we DON'T KNOW what is going on or which tale to trust.  It seems all governments are corrupt, power corrupts. We HOPE that we can trust the people in power but sooner or later the green slime starts oozing out. Who would have thought the mild mannered John Majors was having sex orgies back stage? Clinton YES, but John Majors???  If politicians can lie and create a smoke screen about one thing they can do it about others, ESPECIALLY about something to do with bad decisions. But, as has been said many times, we all have 20/20 hindsight.

The American people put Bush in power.

There is a car bumper sticker over here that reads, "What would Jesus do?"  I am asking what the other human being running for Office at the time would have done?  Probably NOT invade Iraq, that was a job George junior wanted to finish for his dad, but Tony Blair was in on it too! Being far more intelligent, erudite and convincing than Bush he was used as a tool of persuasion on American television. The American people bought into it, they gradually became convinced AT THE TIME. We wanted to trust our politicians you see, that's why we elected them! It is only with that wonderful gift of HINDSIGHT that we are now second guessing, and people such as Paul Craig Roberts is cannily making money by playing to our fears. It is a very old game. Why should we trust him any more than the others?  His impressive resume means nothing except that he is very smart. It does not mean he is any more honest than the rest of them.

"Former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal and former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury Dr. Paul Craig Roberts expressed his dire warning that the US government has fallen into the hands of psychopaths and that the Neo-Cons in the Bush administration may be set to stage another terror attack in the US as part of a black operation to demolish growing dissent and coerce the public to rally behind the government once again."

I mean, this is emotional stuff! Phrases such as, "dire warning" and "fallen into the hands of psychopaths" are meant to jump out at you first, then "set to stage another terror attack" is the flashing red light clincher. In just one long sentence whoever wrote the piece has managed to instil enough doubt and worry into the readers to at least ensure that they will read on. This is good journalism, not NECESSARILY the truth.

A healthy dose of cynicism is what's needed, not building shelters in the garden.  We can only trust that things will come out right in the end.