We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!
Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com
This question is Not Answered
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sextus
+
153567
Mon, 31 Oct 05 04:38 PM
"The disagreements between the defenders of moral realism show that moral values are not real".
Is it not the case that here one must use "between" only if there are two defenders, but "among" if there are more than two?
Sextus
Joined on
Sat, Nov 6 2004
Buenos Aires
Regular Member
731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nona the brit
+
153600
Mon, 31 Oct 05 06:27 PM
Joined on
Wed, Sep 22 2004
England
Veteran Member
11,713
The name says it all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
paco2004
+
153621
Mon, 31 Oct 05 08:12 PM
Hi
I agree we have no choice other than 'between' in the case of two defenders. But as for the case there are more than two defenders, I think we can choose both 'among' and 'between'. OED says about the choice as follows.
In all senses, 'between' has been, from its earliest appearance, extended to more than two. In OE. and ME. it was so extended in sense 1 (=local relation of points), in which among is now considered better. It is still the only word available to express the relation of a thing to many surrounding things severally and individually, among expressing a relation to them collectively and vaguely: we should not say 'the space lying among the three points,' or 'a treaty among three powers,' or 'the choice lies among the three candidates in the select list,' or 'to insert a needle among the closed petals of a flower.'
Suppose there are three defenders, A, B and C. If I hear 'disagreement(s) between them', I feel like : A and B disagree, B and C disagree, and C and A disagree. If I hear 'disagreement(s) among them', I feel, it can also mean such a case that A and B agree but C disagrees with A and B. But it's my humble opinion and I might be wrong as usual.
[FYI] results of Google survey disagreement(s) between three … 115+(19) disagreement(s) among three … 67+(8)
paco
Joined on
Wed, Nov 17 2004
Senior Member
4,095
In Japan today even dogs are learning how to bow-wow in English.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sextus
+
153633
Mon, 31 Oct 05 08:39 PM
Aha... Very interesting post, Paco. I think you usually tend to give this kind of useful and exact information.
Thanks to you and the others who have answered my question,
Sextus
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous,
4 yr 21 days ago
So it should be:
I can tell the difference between (not among) the three men.
Isn't it? Thanks.
Ricky
|
|
|
|
|
|
paco2004
+
153770
Tue, 01 Nov 05 04:21 AM
Hello Ricky
As you see, I'm a mere learner. So I cannot tell you anything with confidence. What I can say is something I found in written documents or the result of google survey.
As for "difference between/among (the) three", the google gives: difference(s) between (the) three … 126,000+208,000+24,000+21,000=379,000 difference(s) among (the) three … 122,000+42,000+21,400+600=186,000
If you restrict the search domain into Gutemberg.org (collection of English classic literature), the result will be : difference(s) between (the) three … 18+2+7+2=29 difference(s) among (the) three … 0+0+0+0=0
paco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MrPedantic
+
154103
Wed, 02 Nov 05 01:29 AM
Yes; "differences between the three men" might relate to differences as in 1) "things that are different" or 2) "disagreements".
But "differences among the three men" would only relate to "disagreements".
MrP
Joined on
Tue, Oct 12 2004
Veteran Member
12,592
...opella forensis / adducit febris...
|
|
|
|
|
Sextus,
4 yr 20 days ago
I think that today I'm a little dumb, because I couldn't understand your post!
Sextus
|