We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Mon, Dec 20 2004 12:31 PM by JKBelieve. 1 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
JKBelieve  +  62484 Mon, 20 Dec 04 12:31 PM


' The Marquis knew every shilling of his son's debts. At his lamented demise, he was found himself to be possessor of many of his heir's bonds, purchased for their benefit, and devised by his Lordship to the children of his younger son.'


As usual I don't understand this passage very well. Please tell me what it's saying....

Thank you.
Joined on Thu, Nov 25 2004
Full Member 278
Reality is what we believe it is - JK
Mister Micawber  +  62505 Mon, 20 Dec 04 02:44 PM


Me neither.

The Marquis, because he knew that his elder son was a wastrel, had purchased his own son's bonds (which I think are what we call IOUs now) and had signed them over to his younger son's children, who would presumably benefit by cashing them in... or prevent the arrest of his elder son. Either of which would happen after the Marquis died.

... or something like that.

Joined on Wed, Aug 4 2004
Yokohama
Veteran Member 30,780
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master-- that's all.'
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.