Can anyone help me to explain why this sentence is incorrect?

   Share on Facebook  
Real_Princess  #484088  Sun, 02 Mar 08 04:13 PM

Hi,

I would appreciate any help to explain in grammatical terms why the following sentence doesn't work:

* I didn't talked to Simon on Sunday.

Is it because a past simple verb cannot follow another past tense?  It is obviously incorrect, but I'm not sure how to explain this to my German friend.

I'm not a qualified teacher, but I live in Germany at the moment and have been trying to help some of my friends with their English. They usually ask

for grammatical explanations Tongue Tied

Thank youSmile

  
Not Ranked
Joined on Sun, Mar 2 2008
New Member (07)
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
Susankay  #484090  Sun, 02 Mar 08 04:19 PM

Simple past is talked - I talked, you talked, we talked, etc.

However since you are using the helping verb "did", you use

I did talk

you did talk

he does talk

we did talk

you (plural) did talk

we did talk

I did not talk to Simon on Sunday.

  
Top 500 Contributor
Joined on Sat, Jan 19 2008
Full Member (201)
Clive  #484094  Sun, 02 Mar 08 04:25 PM

Hi,

I would appreciate any help to explain in grammatical terms why the following sentence doesn't work:

* I didn't talked to Simon on Sunday.

Is it because a past simple verb cannot follow another past tense?  It is obviously incorrect, but I'm not sure how to explain this to my German friend.

I'm not a qualified teacher, but I live in Germany at the moment and have been trying to help some of my friends with their English. They usually ask

for grammatical explanations

Your example breaks the rules for how tenses are formed.

How to form Simple Past tense 

I talked         Here, the suffix '-ed' denotes the past

I did not talk. Here, the auxiliary verb 'did' denotes the past, and the main verb must be in base form only.

Best wishes, Clive

 

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Thu, Oct 28 2004
Canada
Veteran Member (22,479)
ModeratorTeachers
El tango argentino es un pensamiento triste que se puede bailar (The tango argentino is a sad thought which can be danced) Enrique Santos Discépolo
Anonymous  #484197  Sun, 02 Mar 08 09:45 PM

I think the best way to explain this is telling your friend that in English you use only one verbal element to indicate the tense. In this sentence the auxiliary "did"  is indicating the past tense so you should keep the verb in the infinitive. Otherwise it will be redundant.

I hope your friend can understand it.

Best wishes, 

 

 
  
CalifJim  #484203  Sun, 02 Mar 08 10:24 PM
 
Real_Princess

why the following sentence doesn't work:

* I didn't talked to Simon on Sunday.

Too many d-markers.  do > did; talk > talked

You can have only one d-marker (or s-marker) per clause, and it has to be on the first verb of the series.

See Re: Have or has 

CJ 

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member (17,697)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
Real_Princess  #484210  Sun, 02 Mar 08 11:12 PM

Thank you all so much Yes   You all make it sound so easy.  That was the problem - I knew it was wrong (duh), but wasn't sure how to explain it

in such a way that my German friends would understand.  I'll explain it all to them tommrow, and no doubt they will be asking for more grammar

practise. I may be back soon Wink

 Warm regards,

  
Anonymous  #586710  Wed, 12 Nov 08 05:46 AM
It's like saying "Ich hate zu Simon gestern gesprochen."
  
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service