We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


1 2
Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Mon, Jul 21 2008 8:01 AM by Liveinjapan. 9 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Liveinjapan  +  544243 Mon, 21 Jul 08 04:41 AM
A Google search for "ABC" results in ten times more hits than a Google search for "XYZ" does.

A Google search for "ABC" results in ten times as many hits as a Google search for XYZ does.

On Google search, "ABC" is found ten times more than "XYZ" is.

On Google search, "ABC" has ten times as many hits as "XYZ" has.

 

Arey they all correct?
Thanks.

Joined on Sun, Feb 4 2007
Osaka, Japan
Senior Member 2,280
Please feel free to correct any words I wrote.LiJ
RayH  +  544246 Mon, 21 Jul 08 04:44 AM
The first two are OK. I wouldn't use the second two.
Joined on Sat, Mar 22 2008
Contributing Member 1,555
Native speaker of U. S. English. Not a grammar expert.
New2grammar  +  544251 Mon, 21 Jul 08 04:53 AM
Is there redundancy? For example,

A Google search for "ABC" results in ten times as many hits as a Google search for XYZ does.
Joined on Tue, Nov 21 2006
Veteran Member 7,676
Who wants to go sailing around the world with me?
Yoong Liat, 1 yr 124 days ago

I would say that 'does' is optional and the sentence sounds better without the word.

RayH  +  544272 Mon, 21 Jul 08 06:04 AM

New2grammar
“Is there redundancy? For example,

A Google search for "ABC" results in ten times as many hits as a Google search for XYZ does.

Not redundancy--repetition for emphasis and clarity. It's hard to come up with good examples on the spur of the moment; however, here is a good example I found on the site linked below.

Here's a short example of structural repetition from the play Getting Married, by George Bernard Shaw:
There are couples who dislike one another furiously for several hours at a time; there are couples who dislike one another permanently; and there are couples who never dislike one another; but these last are people who are incapable of disliking anybody. (emphasis added)
http://grammar.about.com/od/developingparagraphs/a/cohrepetition.htm
http://grammar.about.com/od/rhetoricstyle/a/effectrepet.htm



Here are a couple of examples of redundancy:
An English teacher appears. He appears out of nowhere. He drops a few sentences into your laptop. The sentences are simple.
http://grammar.about.com/b/2008/02/13/building-and-combining-sentences.htm
Many uneducated citizens who have never attended school continue to vote for better schools. (emphasis added)

Well, I hope this helps because I've about reached the limit of my ability to explain this stuff. Smile
RayH  +  544273 Mon, 21 Jul 08 06:06 AM

Yoong Liat

I would say that 'does' is optional and the sentence sounds better without the word.


Quite right, I noticed that on re-reading the post.
Peaceblinkfriend  +  544285 Mon, 21 Jul 08 06:42 AM

What about this? Do you think this is better or worse?

A Google search for "ABC" results in ten times as many hits as that of "XYZ".



Looking forward to reading your replies.


PBF
Joined on Wed, May 9 2007
Senior Member 2,130
Success - it is not the position where you are standing, but which direction you are going.
New2grammar, 1 yr 124 days ago
Peace, I wanted to ask your question but


That for or that of... Think about it a minute. (^o)) Hmm

Peaceblinkfriend  +  544315 Mon, 21 Jul 08 07:58 AM
New2grammar
“Peace, I wanted to ask your question but


That for or that of... Think about it a minute. (^o)) Hmm



I was going back and forth between 'that of' and 'that for' as well and then I settled down with 'that of'. It sounded better that way to my ears though I know it doesn't really correspond to the first time Google search was mentioned (Google search for "ABC") so to speak. At any rate, I am not certain replacing 'the Google search for "XYZ"' with 'that of/for' does much as the very least.


PBF
1 2
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.