Attn MrPedantic , blitz here

1 2 3 4 5 6
   Share on Facebook  
blitzball_playerr  #56723  Mon, 22 Nov 04 10:24 AM
PS

I rode my bike.
He gave me a present

PP
I have+ridden my bike.
He has+given me a present.

.....how come the first two sentences are correct and as well as the secnd two
i rode my bike
" i have been riding my bike"for a year now(is this sentence correct?)
i have ridden my bike ( maybe if u add "just" in the middle of those two, the sentences might look correct but as of now i dont think it makes n e sence, its as same as i rode my bike so i think wen u wnt to tell sumone u have just ridden a bike u can use both PP and PS????????

**he didnt give me a present ( he dont intend to either)
he hasnt given me a present ( he has not but he just might gimme one)
so the 2nd sentence here seems to be right but the sentence
he has given me a present ( it makes no sence its as same as its counterpart dont u think so? so for this also we can use both PP and PS they'll ulitimatly mean the same)

and ONE MORE thing
do you think ppl will notice this kinda stuff wen we talk
.....cuz ya kno in the sentence
she grew maize for ten yrs(she stopped growing)
she has grown maize for ten yrs( shes still growing)
thoug the above two have a difference but i dont think its noticed cuz ppl here dont talk like this i think so i cud be wrong too..
PLZ CORRECT ME
  
Not Ranked
Joined on Fri, Oct 29 2004
Junior Member (54)
MrPedantic  #56762  Mon, 22 Nov 04 04:19 PM
Hello Blitz

Yes, I should probably qualify what I said before: the PS is used in contexts where you don't want to imply a connection to the present; the PP, where you do.

So:

'Yesterday I rode my bike across the field' - PS. You only want to talk about yesterday.

'I've ridden my bike to work every day this week' - PP. It's still 'this week', so the action has a relation to the present.

'I've been riding my bike for a year now' - this is fine. It's another form of the PP, called the 'present perfect progressive' (PPP). It consists of [have/has+been+-ing form of verb].You use it when you want to stress the 'continuing' nature of an action.

'I have just ridden my bike' - PP - it is very difficult to think of a context for this. It's not something you often hear...Maybe: a boy has had a broken leg for 12 weeks; the plaster cast has just been taken off; he's at home doing all the things he used to do; he comes in from the street and says to his mother 'I've just ridden my bike!'

'No, he didn't give me a present' - PS. The (non-)action is complete; you don't expect anything now.

'He hasn't given me a present yet' - PP ("he has not but he just might gimme one"). The non-giving has a relation to the present, because you're implying there's still a chance a present will turn up.

'He gave me a present for my birthday' - PS - incident closed.

'He's already given me a present for my birthday' - PP - the giving has a relation to the present, because this is still a time when you might receive birthday presents.

do you think ppl will notice this kinda stuff wen we talk

i dont think its noticed cuz ppl here dont talk like this

These differences are pretty certain to apply in newspaper English, or written business English, for instance. Spoken English is another matter, and it wouldn't be surprising if people in different areas used the PS and PP slightly differently.

For instance, colloquially, you might hear:
'Are you ready for school yet?' - 'Ready for school? I only just woke up.' = PS.

In formal English, this would be:
'Are you ready for school yet?' - 'Ready for school? I've only just woken up.' = PP.

In other words, where people observe the difference between the two tenses, you can say that one is the PS, and the other is the PP. Where people don't observe the difference, you can say that for those people, the PS has some of the functions of the PP.

Quite tricky, really.

MrP
  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Oct 13 2004
Veteran Member (12,138)
Proficient SpeakerSystemAdministrator
...opella forensis / adducit febris...
blitzball_playerr  #56765  Mon, 22 Nov 04 04:32 PM
yeah ur right its really tricky so do u advise me to go ahead using the colloquial forms ??
and umm wat does you have screwed over my friend mean?
and can it be "no he didnt gimme a present yet" is this correct?

hey and
i called to check "whether ur phone is working or not"
"if ur phones working propeerly"
ok both sentences are right lolz but ya kno the usage of "if" and" whether" in these kinda sentences r very confusing can u just temme the proper way to use them in this kinda situation
for eg:-
i called to check "if hes going out or not"
i called to check "whether he is going out or not"

ok so which of the above sentence is wrong and y?
  
MrPedantic  #56863  Tue, 23 Nov 04 12:31 AM
Hello Blitz

ur right its really tricky so do u advise me to go ahead using the colloquial forms?

It would depend on the context. Sometimes using the colloquial forms can put you at a disadvantage. Say you speak "English: regional variation X". Anyone who doesn't speak X is going to find X strange. So if you used X in business letters, essays, official documents, etc., you'd be putting yourself at a disadvantage, because the reader would probably be non-X.

If you used X for the dialogue in stories, on the other hand, you'd probably be OK. But if you used it for the body of the text, you might deter non-Xs. Then again, it would probably be closer to what you wanted to say.

Also, if you lived among X-speakers, and started talking standard English, they'd find it pretty strange.

Probably the best thing is to know both X and standard English, and use whichever one suits the occasion.

you have screwed over my friend

I think this means, in a forceful way, 'you have taken my friend for a ride', 'you have acted to the disadvantage of my friend'.

no he didnt gimme a present yet

This is a colloquial PS, used instead of the more 'formal' PP:
'No, he hasn't given me a present yet.'

I called to check whether your phone is working or not/if your phone's working properly

Both are fine. You can leave out the 'or not' if you want. You can also say 'I called to check whether your phone was working'.

I called to check if he's going out or not/I called to check whether he's going out or not


Again, both sound fine to me!

MrP
  
blitzball_playerr  #57008  Tue, 23 Nov 04 03:19 PM
"i am going to be gone for a shower" is this sentence right?
  
MrPedantic  #57063  Tue, 23 Nov 04 08:44 PM
Hello Blitz

These would be ok:

'I'm going to be gone when you get back' (= I'll have gone by the time you get back).

'I'm going to be gone for 3 weeks.' (=I'm going to be away for 3 weeks.)

But 'I'm going to be gone for a shower' sounds slightly odd to me. In what situation would you say it?

(Maybe:

'Don't bother calling me later. I'm going to be gone for a shower'?)

MrP


  
blitzball_playerr  #57229  Wed, 24 Nov 04 12:50 PM
he hadnt had the chance to prove himself (is this one right)
if it wernt for u we wouldnt have had been together ( is this one right)

thanx alot uvebeen a lot of help to me
  
MrPedantic  #57347  Thu, 25 Nov 04 07:47 AM
You're welcome!

1. 'He hadn't had the chance to prove himself' - that one's fine.

2. This needs a slight change - take out the 'had':

'If it weren't for you, we wouldn't have been together.'

MrP
  
blitzball_playerr  #57371  Thu, 25 Nov 04 10:45 AM
can you tell me how the usage of "would have" or "would have had" works
  
1 2 3 4 5 6
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service