Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


1 2
Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Wed, Nov 19 2008 12:26 PM by Anonymous. 15 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Guest  +  36670 Fri, 09 Jul 04 03:42 PM
Which is correct, "That was written in bad English" or "That was written in poor English"?
Guest, 5 yr 122 days ago
Strictly speaking "bad" means evil. You are more precise if you write "That was written in poor English." However almost all English speakers say "bad" when they mean "poor." At this point you can get away with either poor or bad.
miriam  +  36733 Sat, 10 Jul 04 06:09 AM
Actually, and speaking even more strictly, "bad" has several meanings.
One of them is "not good, unwanted or unacceptable". "Evil" is far from being the only meaning of "bad".
"Poor" means, in this sentence, "below the usual standard, low in quality".

"Poor" is often used by teachers, but either word can be used in the example.

Joined on Mon, May 10 2004
Argentina
Regular Member 821
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something." Plato
lostfrogg  +  36788 Sun, 11 Jul 04 01:03 AM
The phrases "That was written in bad English" and "That was written in poor English" are both far from perfect. "That was written using poor English" would get closer to the truth.
Joined on Sat, Jul 10 2004
New Member 09
mask  +  36793 Sun, 11 Jul 04 01:21 AM
The phrases "That was written in bad English" and "That was written in poor English" are both far from perfect. "That was written using poor English" would get closer to the truth. "


Why?

Joined on Sun, Feb 22 2004
Junior Member 56
miriam, 5 yr 120 days ago
Yes, why?
And, what truth?
bratannia  +  36911 Sun, 11 Jul 04 11:58 PM
Wouldn't "that was written using poor English" be a misuse of a participle?

The writing, per se, was not done using any kind of English. It was done using a writing implement such as a pen or a computer. On the other hand, what began as a thought and emerged on the page was an example of poor English. The poor English first becomes perceptible when we see it subsisting in the text. Therefore, we would normally say, "that was written in poor English." We conceive the construction of the English phrasing, a logical function, as being separate from the writing process.

True, Miriam?

Joined on Fri, Apr 9 2004
Amsterdam
Junior Member 66
miriam  +  36928 Mon, 12 Jul 04 03:37 AM
Hello, Brattania Smile [:)]

Honestly, I don't know if "using poor English" exists or is acceptable.

I've heard teachers tell their students to "use English" when they start speaking Spanish in the classroom. But then, those teachers are, like me, Argentinian, and English isn't our first language.

I agree that, strictly speaking, a word or sentence is written using a pen or a pencil. I wouldn't say "using English" myself, but I cannot say I'm sure it's wrong.

Miriam
migo, 5 yr 119 days ago
Use English is ok. It's like "use your English knowledge".
1 2
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3598.39794. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.