Hi,
What is the difference among them? Which one(s) would you use?
A. BEFORE
1- I brushed my teeth before I had gone to bed. No reason to use PP. Just use simple past
2- I brushed my teeth before I went to bed. Yes
3- I had brushed my teeth before I went to bed. No reason to use PP, because sequence of events is clear withiout it. Just use simple past
B. AFTER
1- I went to bed after I had brushed my teeth. No reason to use PP. Just use simple past
2- I went to bed after I brushed my teeth. Yes
3- I had gone to bed after I brushed my teeth. No reason to use PP, because sequence of events is clear withiout it. Just use simple past
additional questions:
a) Is it possible to use "past perfect" both in the main clause and in the subordinate clause (at the same time) in the sentences above? ie 'I had brushed my teeth before I had gone to bed'. I suppose it's possible, but you really need a context where you want to stress that you did these things before some other event. eg
I accidentally went into the wrong bedroom and got into bed with our guest, my wife's beautiful friend from university. Fortunately, I had brushed my teeth before I had gone to bed, so she didn't tell me to get out of bed. Even here, I'd actually prefer simple past in before I went to bed.
b) Is it possible to use "past continuous" either in the main clause or in the subordinate clause with "after" or "before"?
I was brushing my teeth before I went to bed. I guess you could say this. It stresses the duration of the brushing activity. It also focuses on the time of brushing, eg
I was brushing my teeth before I went to bed when suddenly there was an earthquake.
I brushed my teeth before I was going to bed. This sounds strange.
Best wishes, Clive