We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Thu, Nov 16 2006 8:33 PM by Mr Patrick. 1 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Mr Patrick  +  293644 Wed, 15 Nov 06 10:31 PM

Very nice, thank you.  It's precisely what I needed to study the finer points of the phonetic alphabet.

I have a question though.  What is the reasoning behind terminology like "h-dropping" and "glottal reinforcement"?  I mean, is there a "standard" pattern of speech, and all other accents are described as deviations from that standard? 

Honestly interested,

Patrick

Joined on Thu, Jul 27 2006
Talca, Chile
Junior Member 76
Mr Patrick  +  293994 Thu, 16 Nov 06 08:33 PM

I would like to add that the above post was really intended to go in the main thread about the British Library Archive of English Accents and Dialects.

Phonetics is very scientific and objective in its description of sounds.  All sounds are mapped to an international system of symbols, and are also expressed in terms of the physical process of their production (fricative, etc).  What I don't understand is how (by what process) a scientist, such as the curator of the named archive, will choose a certain accent or dialect to serve as "pure" or unnoteworthy, and then go on and express all other dialects and accents as variations or deviations from the original.

After further reading the named website, I have come to the conclusion that the chosen "base" accent must be RP.  But I am still unsure about just how scientific this choice is, or whether RP is simply the native accent of the curator of the archive.

PS:  Thanks to Nona for fixing the problem with my previous post! Wink [;)]

© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.