by no longer than?

1 2
   Share on Facebook  
Yoong Liat  #358097  Mon, 30 Apr 07 05:30 PM
 Marius Hancu wrote:

NM Tech to Install New Hot Water System

The short-loop project, however, is projected to be finished by no later than November 30, 2005. -NMT-. 801 Leroy Place Socorro, N.M. 87801 ...

Roosevelt Fellows | Brandeis University

Try to enroll in courses that are scheduled before 3pm and are generally finished by no later than 3:30pm. In your team's main season, try to enroll in a ...


Definition by (NOT LATER THAN)  
preposition
not later than; at or before:
She had promised to be back by five o'clock.
The application must be in by the 31st to be accepted.

(from Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary)
IMO, 'no later than' is redundant when used with 'by'.

The following is what I read in one of the English usage books. Instead of 'by', 'on' and 'at the latest' should be used. Hence, the sentence should be rephrased as follows:
The short-loop project, however, is projected to be finished on November 30, 2005.at the latest -NMT-. 801 Leroy Place Socorro, N.M. 87801ant.



  
Top 25 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Sep 4 2006
Singapore
Veteran Member (6,013)
Yoong Liat
Anonymous  #358146  Mon, 30 Apr 07 07:13 PM

 Yoong Liat wrote:
 Kooyeen wrote:
 Marius Hancu wrote:

should be finished by no later than
June 17


Hi Marius,
I wonder if that example is really good. I mean, "by" already means "no later than", so "by no later than June" sounds like "exactly at about 8 o'clock"... What do you think? Smile [:)]


I agree. "By" implies a deadline. So adding other words to it makes the words redundant.

Sorry -for the folks who disagreed, I happened to see it in the same light with Marius. "By no later than 6 o'clock..." means " it's ok to be earlier but no later than" to me. Additionally, to be precise, “by” suggests proximity, not deadline. “No later than” is the phrase which implied deadline.

It's completely correct to say: “ to avoid the morning rush, everyone should be at the parking lot for the roll call by quarter to six and the bus should be leaving no later than 0600”.

  
Goodman  #358149  Mon, 30 Apr 07 07:14 PM

 Yoong Liat wrote:
 Kooyeen wrote:
 Marius Hancu wrote:

should be finished by no later than
June 17


Hi Marius,
I wonder if that example is really good. I mean, "by" already means "no later than", so "by no later than June" sounds like "exactly at about 8 o'clock"... What do you think? Smile [:)]


I agree. "By" implies a deadline. So adding other words to it makes the words redundant.

Sorry -for the folks who disagreed, I happened to see it in the same light with Marius. "By no later than 6 o'clock..." means " it's ok to be earlier but no later than" to me. Additionally, to be precise, “by” suggests proximity, not deadline. “No later than” is the phrase which implied deadline.

It's completely correct to say: “ to avoid the morning rush, everyone should be at the parking lot for the roll call by quarter to six and the bus should be leaving no later than 0600”.

  
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Nov 7 2005
Calif. USA
Senior Member (3,207)
The name says it all!
Yoong Liat  #358222  Mon, 30 Apr 07 09:24 PM
 Goodman wrote:


Sorry -for the folks who disagreed, I happened to see it in the same light with Marius. "By no later than 6 o'clock..." means " it's ok to be earlier but no later than" to me. Additionally, to be precise, “by” suggests proximity, not deadline. “No later than” is the phrase which implied deadline.

It's completely correct to say: “ to avoid the morning rush, everyone should be at the parking lot for the roll call by quarter to six and the bus should be leaving no later than 0600”.


NM Tech to Install New Hot Water System

The short-loop project, however, is projected to be finished by no later than November 30, 2005. -NMT-. 801 Leroy Place Socorro, N.M. 87801 ...


Roosevelt Fellows | Brandeis University

Try to enroll in courses that are scheduled before 3pm and are generally finished by no later than 3:30pm. In your team's main season, try to enroll in a ...


Goodman wrote: “It's completely correct to say: “ to avoid the morning rush, everyone should be at the parking lot for the roll call by quarter to six and the bus should be leaving no later than 0600” (Your sentence is fine. It does not contain the words no later than.

Based on the above sentences provided by Marius, your sentence should be worded as follows:

To avoid the morning rush, everyone should be at the parking lot for the roll call by no later than quarter to six and the bus should be leaving by no later than 0600.


  
Goodman  #358277  Mon, 30 Apr 07 11:10 PM

Mr. Liat,

 

Since you disagreed with the sentence by Marius, I just simply wanted to share my opinions on the usage with ‘by” and “no later than” in a context that is easy for those who disagreed to visualize.  Please - I mean please! Stop advising people who deal and use English everyday professionally on their jobs how they should word their sentence. Just because I am not a native does not mean I know any less than you. I can say this, nobody speaks and uses perfect English 24/ 7. If someone even suggests a slight hint that he does, either he is a liar or he is God. My English has blemishes here and there and may need the experts to point them out. I realize that. Unless you consider yourself in the same caliber as the natives on this forum, stop imposing your wills and views on the others. I believe learners appreciate opinions from fellow posters. However, the way in which an opinion is expressed can make a difference between appreciation and irritation. Do you catch my drift?

 

  
Yoong Liat  #358343  Tue, 01 May 07 03:20 AM
 Goodman wrote:

Mr. Liat,

 

Since you disagreed with the sentence by Marius, I just simply wanted to share my opinions on the usage with ‘by” and “no later than” in a context that is easy for those who disagreed to visualize.  Please - I mean please! Stop advising people who deal and use English everyday professionally on their jobs how they should word their sentence. Just because I am not a native does not mean I know any less than you. I can say this, nobody speaks and uses perfect English 24/ 7. If someone even suggests a slight hint that he does, either he is a liar or he is God. My English has blemishes here and there and may need the experts to point them out. I realize that. Unless you consider yourself in the same caliber as the natives on this forum, stop imposing your wills and views on the others. I believe learners appreciate opinions from fellow posters. However, the way in which an opinion is expressed can make a difference between appreciation and irritation. Do you catch my drift?

 


Hi Goodman

If you want to answer questions, you should stick to the original sentences provided. Members are here to discuss and  see each other's views and in the end we, including me, can decide whether the usage is right or wrong. You deviated by providing sentences which are grammatically correct. This serves no purpose in my opinion.

Please do not pass judgement on others. Just let this discussion carry on and see how other members reply to the answers from you, me and  other members, be they native or non-native speakers. I'm sure with more patience, we will get more views and learn more about the usage of 'by'.

Best regards

  
Jackson6612  #358378  Tue, 01 May 07 05:19 AM
 Goodman wrote:

Mr. Liat,

 

Since you disagreed with the sentence by Marius, I just simply wanted to share my opinions on the usage with ‘by” and “no later than” in a context that is easy for those who disagreed to visualize.  Please - I mean please! Stop advising people who deal and use English everyday professionally on their jobs how they should word their sentence. Just because I am not a native does not mean I know any less than you. I can say this, nobody speaks and uses perfect English 24/ 7. If someone even suggests a slight hint that he does, either he is a liar or he is God. My English has blemishes here and there and may need the experts to point them out. I realize that. Unless you consider yourself in the same caliber as the natives on this forum, stop imposing your wills and views on the others. I believe learners appreciate opinions from fellow posters. However, the way in which an opinion is expressed can make a difference between appreciation and irritation. Do you catch my drift?

 

Hi Goodman,

I don't think there was any need to use red-coloured statements above. I think that's not the kind of thing you should say on friendly forum like this one. You could disagree with Y. Liat and he could disagree with you. You both have right to do so. As far as I know, Yoong does not impose his wills or views, rather he qoutes from authoritative sources as he did in this very thread. Some natives could also be wrong because they don't read that much English Grammar or Usage books like non-natives do, since English is their mother tongue.

Best Wishes

  
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Dec 27 2006
Senior Member (2,952)
Trusted Users
NOTE: When you reply to my post, please look for mistakes in grammar, syntax or punctuation, and let me know of any suggestions you have. Thank you.
Goodman  #358396  Tue, 01 May 07 05:56 AM
 Jackson6612 wrote:
 Goodman wrote:

Mr. Liat,

 

Since you disagreed with the sentence by Marius, I just simply wanted to share my opinions on the usage with ‘by” and “no later than” in a context that is easy for those who disagreed to visualize.  Please - I mean please! Stop advising people who deal and use English everyday professionally on their jobs how they should word their sentence. Just because I am not a native does not mean I know any less than you. I can say this, nobody speaks and uses perfect English 24/ 7. If someone even suggests a slight hint that he does, either he is a liar or he is God. My English has blemishes here and there and may need the experts to point them out. I realize that. Unless you consider yourself in the same caliber as the natives on this forum, stop imposing your wills and views on the others. I believe learners appreciate opinions from fellow posters. However, the way in which an opinion is expressed can make a difference between appreciation and irritation. Do you catch my drift?

 

Hi Goodman,

I don't think there was any need for red-coloured statements above. You could disagree with Y. Liat and he could disagree with you. You both have right to do so. As far as I know, Yoong does not impose his wills or views, rather he qoutes from authoritative sources as he did in this very thread. Some natives could also be wrong because they don't read English Grammar or Usage books, since English is their mother tongue.

Best Wishes

Jackson,

I have no problem with your comment nor you for that matter. I have no problem discussing anything with anybody either. I have accepted mistakes in the past and I will face up to what I said. I appreciate your comments. Liat has his point and I have mine. I am not the kind of people who would sugarcoat their sentiments. I always spoke my mind which perhaps is not tolerable to the forum. I just wish that Mr. Liat would stop telling people what they should or should not write or say in such a direct tone. I shall leave it at that.

 

 

 

 

  
Jackson6612  #358407  Tue, 01 May 07 06:13 AM
 Goodman wrote:
 Jackson6612 wrote:
 Goodman wrote:

Mr. Liat,

 

Since you disagreed with the sentence by Marius, I just simply wanted to share my opinions on the usage with ‘by” and “no later than” in a context that is easy for those who disagreed to visualize.  Please - I mean please! Stop advising people who deal and use English everyday professionally on their jobs how they should word their sentence. Just because I am not a native does not mean I know any less than you. I can say this, nobody speaks and uses perfect English 24/ 7. If someone even suggests a slight hint that he does, either he is a liar or he is God. My English has blemishes here and there and may need the experts to point them out. I realize that. Unless you consider yourself in the same caliber as the natives on this forum, stop imposing your wills and views on the others. I believe learners appreciate opinions from fellow posters. However, the way in which an opinion is expressed can make a difference between appreciation and irritation. Do you catch my drift?

 

Hi Goodman,

I don't think there was any need for red-coloured statements above. You could disagree with Y. Liat and he could disagree with you. You both have right to do so. As far as I know, Yoong does not impose his wills or views, rather he qoutes from authoritative sources as he did in this very thread. Some natives could also be wrong because they don't read English Grammar or Usage books, since English is their mother tongue.

Best Wishes

Jackson,

I have no problem with your comment nor you for that matter. I have no problem discussing anything with anybody either. I have accepted mistakes in the past and I will face up to what I said. I appreciate your comments. Liat has his point and I have mine. I am not the kind of people who would sugarcoat their sentiments. I always spoke my mind which perhaps is not tolerable to the forum. I just wish that Mr. Liat would stop telling people what they should or should not write or say in such a direct tone. I shall leave it at that.

Hi Goodman,

Everyone makes mistakes and you don't make mistakes that often. Most of the time you make typos.Smile [:)] Didn't I agree with you on that adjective vs. past participle discussion. I know you speak your mind boldly, that's a very good thing. I was just trying to say there is no need to exchange such things. Yoong was quoting from a reliable source, therefore he has the right to be firm on his point and you have the right to firm on your point. Be like friends. Englishforums makes us a family.Smile [:)]

Kind Regards,

Jackson

  
1 2
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions