Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Fri, Jul 25 2008 12:33 PM by New2grammar. 2 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
New2grammar  +  546143 Fri, 25 Jul 08 06:55 AM
I'm lost again on countable vs uncountable.

There are a lot of fish in the river.
Cattle are a source of meat.
Fish is/are a source of protein. (I feel 'is' is better but it doesn't follow the cattle pattern )

What do you think?
Thanks.


Joined on Tue, Nov 21 2006
Veteran Member 7,676
Who wants to go sailing around the world with me?
Mister Micawber  +  546192 Fri, 25 Jul 08 10:50 AM
.
Fish and cattle are both common plurals for the animals.
Fish is also the common uncountable form for the foodstuff.  That's why 'is' seems more normal.
Joined on Wed, Aug 4 2004
Yokohama
Veteran Member 30,501
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master-- that's all.'
New2grammar, 1 yr 105 days ago
That makes a lot of sense, thanks, MM.
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3598.39794. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.