Change subordinate clauses to phrases

   Share on Facebook  
Anonymous  #314315  Fri, 12 Jan 07 10:45 AM

Change subordinate clauses in to phrases

 

1- Since Jone opened his super market , he has been working 15 hours day.

2- When he was asked to tell the story , he cleared his throat  nervously.

3- Because they had had no map, they got lost.

4- Because i did not want to interrupt the speaker, i adjourned my question to the break.

5- He did not go out on Friday because i advised him not to.

  
Tidus  #314346  Fri, 12 Jan 07 01:18 PM

All you need to do is rearrange the sentence so that it doesn't begin with a subordinate conjunction ie Since, when, because etc,  ie

Jone has been working 15 hours a day since he opened his supermarket.

  
Top 200 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Nov 27 2006
England
Full Member (362)
Cool Breeze  #314380  Fri, 12 Jan 07 02:28 PM
Changing the order of the clauses is no solution. I think what you  want  -  or your teacher wants  -  is clause equivalents:

1. After opening / (After) having opened his supermarket, Jone has been working 15 hours a day.
2. (When) asked to tell the story, he cleared his throat nervously.
3. Having (had) no map, they got lost.
4. Not wanting to interrupt the speaker, I adjourned my question to the break.

I can't think of an acceptable clause equivalent for No. 5 because the subordinate clause is causal and has its own subject (I). Perhaps something like He did not go out on Friday owing to my advice will do?

Cheers
CB
  
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on Fri, Apr 7 2006
Helsinki, Finland
Senior Member (2,962)
Proficient SpeakerTrusted Users
The coldest winter I ever spent was a summer in San Francisco.- Mark Twain
Marius Hancu  #314388  Fri, 12 Jan 07 02:51 PM
Cool Breeze:

Is your "clause equivalent" another name for "absolute construction?"

[link]
  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Apr 26 2006
Montreal, Canada
Veteran Member (11,673)
Proficient Speaker
pieanne  #314396  Fri, 12 Jan 07 03:08 PM

5. I advised him not to go out on Friday, and he didn't.

 Tongue Tied [:S]

  
Top 25 Contributor
Joined on Thu, Jan 20 2005
South of France ...But I'm Belgian!
Veteran Member (7,512)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
I'm glad to help, but I'm not a native! And please excuse my typos...
Cool Breeze  #314397  Fri, 12 Jan 07 03:22 PM
 Marius Hancu wrote:
Cool Breeze:

Is your "clause equivalent" another name for "absolute construction?"

[link]

Hi Marius

It seems to be! I hope you don't mind my sticking to a term I am familiar with.Smile [:)] I wasn't quite sure what the original poster wanted because he used the term 'phrases'.

Cheers
CB
  
Marius Hancu  #314399  Fri, 12 Jan 07 03:32 PM
 Cool Breeze wrote:


It seems to be! I hope you don't mind my sticking to a term I am familiar with.Smile [:)] I wasn't quite sure what the original poster wanted because he used the term 'phrases'.

I don't mind it at all, but could you indicate some references (books or sites) which are using it? Just curious. There's so much terminology out there in grammar.
  
Cool Breeze  #314580  Fri, 12 Jan 07 10:23 PM
 Marius Hancu wrote:

I don't mind it at all, but could you indicate some references (books or sites) which are using it? Just curious. There's so much terminology out there in grammar.

Hi Marius

I first heard or saw the term more than 40 years ago, so I don't remember what book I was reading. The Internet (or the internet as Personal Computer World magazine and some other magazines prefer it) didn't exist in those days. I did a Google search and here is one of the sites that use it: [link]

I haven't read it at all, so I don't know how comprehensive their exposition on clause equivalents is. It may not amount to much.Tongue Tied [:S]

Cheers
CB
  
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service