Cheerleader after cheerleader was practicing her move.
Though it does not have the same meaning it does have the same structure as
(A)cheerleader was practicing her move after (another) cheerleader.
or
After (a) cheerleader, (another) cheerleader was practicing her move.
You can understand after cheerleader as a group of words having a function of an adverb. Precisely with plural you can write only this way
They were practicing their move, cheerleader after cheerleader.
or
Cheerleader after cheerleader, they were practicing their move.
In this case, a complete expression cheerleader after cheerleader has an adverbial function: (each) cheerleader (in a group) after (each) cheerleader (in a group)
In English there must be a subject in the sentence, and there is no word to be a subject in
Cheerleader after cheerleader was practicing her move.
except cheerleader. And that gives us no right to use plural. Another example:
[Who] An apple [what] was cut. [Who] An apple [when] after an apple [what]was cut. [Who] They [what] were cut [how] (an) apple by (an) apple ((an) apple after (an) apple).
So two (third is only an inversion) options
- Cheerleader [when:] after cheerleader is/was ...
- They are/were ... ,[how:] cheerleader after cheerleader.
- [how:]Cheerleader after cheerleader, they are/were...