Hello Davkett
1. But if they weren't dirtied, they'd still be in the glove compartment.
Here, to my ears, the speaker is supporting an assertion that the tissues are dirty (they must be dirty, because they're in the bin); whereas in my scenario, the speaker is supporting his assertion that the tissues are clean (they must be clean because they're not in the bin).
2. But if they aren't clean, they will be in the garbage can
Here, again to my ears, the state of the tissues is being discussed: we can find out if they're dirty by looking in the bin. (I have to say, I wouldn't like to be stuck in a speeding vehicle with those two.)
I suppose this kind of situation might be more likely, for the structure in #2:
3. "Can I have an apple?" "I think all the apples have been eaten. But if they haven't all been eaten, they'll be in the fruit bowl."
(But have I missed something? I feel, vaguely, as if we've run into an ambiguity somewhere, and you're discussing one side of it, and I'm discussing the other.)
MrP