We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


1 2
Share this topic:
jack112  +  129763 Tue, 23 Aug 05 01:55 AM
 MrPedantic wrote:

"I'm not sure. But if they weren't clean, they'd be in that tiny garbage can."

MrP

MrPedantic, you have 'I'm not sure.' So how can you still use 'if they weren't clean,..' With 'weren't', I'm saying they are clean though? Doesn't it contradict with 'I'm not sure' ?

Thanks.

Joined on Thu, Jul 22 2004
Regular Member 715
davkett  +  129764 Tue, 23 Aug 05 02:07 AM

They're in a grimey old '66 Dodge pick-up truck, racing to the airport where they'll meet up with other members of the gang waiting on the airstrip with 3 kilos in the cockpit. She's in the back seat with his pal.  She's bleeding from a gunshot wound.  There's only a paper towel roll on the dash, along with all the other crap the truck driver never bothered to clean out since day one.

His pal wants clean paper towels, okay

Now, answer the */&*##*!*! question.

Joined on Tue, Jun 7 2005
Pennsylvania, USA
Senior Member 2,788
"The rose stays fresh in its name..." -Bernard of Morlay
MrPedantic  +  130116 Wed, 24 Aug 05 12:27 AM
 Jack112 wrote:
 MrPedantic wrote:

"I'm not sure. But if they weren't clean, they'd be in that tiny garbage can."

MrP

MrPedantic, you have 'I'm not sure.' So how can you still use 'if they weren't clean,..' With 'weren't', I'm saying they are clean though? Doesn't it contradict with 'I'm not sure' ?

Thanks.

Hello Jack

Without looking, you can't be sure; so you say 'I'm not sure'.

But on second thoughts, you know you would have thrown any dirty ones away. So that knowledge makes you more sure than you were a moment ago.

In effect, the 'But if...' sentence qualifies 'I'm not sure'.

MrP

Joined on Tue, Oct 12 2004
Veteran Member 12,592
...opella forensis / adducit febris...
MrPedantic  +  130120 Wed, 24 Aug 05 12:37 AM

Hello Davkett

I'm envisaging a conversation like this:

"Do you have any tissues?"

"There should be some in the glove compartment."

"Are they clean?"

"Of course they're clean!"

"Are you sure?"

"Well, no, I'm not 'sure'. But if they weren't¹ clean, they'd be in that bijou little garbage can." [sc. where I always throw the dirty ones.]

"Well, these aren't clean. Look!"

"Well, I don't know how they got there. But if those ones aren't² clean, throw them away, okay?"

So the subjunctive/past tense¹ is used here to present what the speaker believes to be unreal, and the present tense² for the real.

Whereas in this sentence:

"But if they aren't clean, they'd be in that garbage can."

the first clause seems to relate to the real (she has to look at those particular tissues to know whether they're clean or not), and the second clause to the unreal (those particular tissues would be in the garbage can if they were dirty). So it does sound strange to me.

But I may be mishearing...Any other views out there?

MrP

davkett  +  130129 Wed, 24 Aug 05 01:27 AM

MrP,

I feel at some disadvantage here because all I have is my hearing sense, and not the technical categories. I'm wondering why the line in your scenario wouldn't be written this way:

"Well, no, I'm not 'sure'. But if they weren't dirtied, they'd still be in the glove compartment."

PS:  Is it better to say, "But if they aren't clean, they will be in the garbage can"?

 

 

MrPedantic  +  130426 Thu, 25 Aug 05 12:30 AM

Hello Davkett

1. But if they weren't dirtied, they'd still be in the glove compartment.

Here, to my ears, the speaker is supporting an assertion that the tissues are dirty (they must be dirty, because they're in the bin); whereas in my scenario, the speaker is supporting his assertion that the tissues are clean (they must be clean because they're not in the bin).

2. But if they aren't clean, they will be in the garbage can

Here, again to my ears, the state of the tissues is being discussed: we can find out if they're dirty by looking in the bin. (I have to say, I wouldn't like to be stuck in a speeding vehicle with those two.)

I suppose this kind of situation might be more likely, for the structure in #2:

3. "Can I have an apple?" "I think all the apples have been eaten. But if they haven't all been eaten, they'll be in the fruit bowl."

(But have I missed something? I feel, vaguely, as if we've run into an ambiguity somewhere, and you're discussing one side of it, and I'm discussing the other.)

MrP

davkett  +  130453 Thu, 25 Aug 05 02:02 AM
 MrPedantic wrote:

 I feel, vaguely, as if we've run into an ambiguity somewhere, and you're discussing one side of it, and I'm discussing the other.

I'm quite willing to believe that it is I who has the tense all wrong.  But I'm appreciative of, and will gladly accept, the 'out' you've provided here.

1 2
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.