«...clean grimy hands...»

   Share on Facebook  
Ant_222  #569995  Wed, 24 Sep 08 08:40 PM

Hi, evetybody.

Below is the third and so far the last question concerning LOTR:

Tom Bombadil: "You shall clean grimy hads and wash your weary faces."

Neither an article nor a pronoun modifies "hads". How is that possible?

Thanks you very much in advance,
Anton

  
Top 75 Contributor
Joined on Sun, May 21 2006
Podolsk, Russia
Contributing Member (1,588)
Grammar Geek  #570001  Wed, 24 Sep 08 08:48 PM

The word is supposed to be hands.

You will wash hands that are grimy and wash faces that are weary.

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Tue, Jan 10 2006
Pennsylvania, USA
Veteran Member (16,645)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
Barbara, who answers in American English.
Ant_222  #570004  Wed, 24 Sep 08 08:55 PM
Thank you, GG. I would have never looked at it from this angle...
  
MissMandy  #570044  Wed, 24 Sep 08 11:40 PM
Unless you are talking about specific hands, you do not need an article of any sort. Generic plurals just don't need articles.  I would guess that the author was looking for poetic writing, or else he would have probably added the pronoun "your" just as he did for "weary faces". But it isn't necessary.

Hope that helps!

 

~Miss Mandy 

  
Not Ranked
Joined on Mon, Sep 15 2008
Seattle, WA USA
New Member (17)
~Miss Mandy
Ant_222  #570382  Thu, 25 Sep 08 06:28 PM

MissMandy
Hope that helps!

Sure it does!

I hope one wouldn't say similar things when addressing one person: "Hey, Paul, you should wash a weary face."... Somehow it works only with hands ('cause most of us have two ones) and only with more than one person, right?

Anton

  
MissMandy  #570400  Thu, 25 Sep 08 07:30 PM
Haha, you gave me a funny picture in my head. If you told Paul to wash a weary face, he would probably be looking around for someone else's weary face to wash because you can't tell him to wash his own face that way; a tells the listener that we are being generic. If you wanted him to wash his own weary face, you'd need a possessive determiner (your). So, yes, you seem correct.

When thinking about determiners (articles are a category of determiners), you always need to decide if the noun is count or non-count, and if it is count, if it is plural or singular as well as if it is generic of specific. With non-count nouns you need to decide if the noun is specific or generic. Once all of that has been decided, you still have lots of choices.(Go to Wikipedia's "Determiners" page to see the long list.)

If you want, send me an email and I'll send you a PDF graphic that I give to all my grammar students. Determiners are tiny, but powerful and confusing, little words. I'll send the file to anyone who wants it. Just send me your email.

 

~Miss Mandy 

  
Ant_222  #570411  Thu, 25 Sep 08 07:52 PM

MissMandy
...a tells the listener that we are being generic. If you wanted him to wash his own weary face, you'd need a possessive determiner (your)

Hmmm. I thought that a + singular countable noun was the same as zero article + plural countable noun.

Why wouldn't the hobbits look around for other(s)' grimy hands and not their ones? In the original sentence, "hands" doesn't have a determiner either... Having re-reading GG's explanation and trying to unite it with yours, I am starting to think that that might be the case...

Anton

 

  
MissMandy  #570416  Thu, 25 Sep 08 08:03 PM
 

Ant_222
Hmmm. I thought that a + singular countable noun was the same as zero article + plural countable noun.

You're absolutely right.

The original sentence may have led the hobbits to go looking for others' dirty hands to wash because the author chose to omit the word "your" before "grimy hands". As I said earlier, its seems like it was poetic license in that case, otherwise I would have expected him to add the "your" back in, just as he did with the faces. My point was more that a plural noun does not always need an a determiner.

 I would guess that if any up-and-coming author had written that sentence, his or her editor would not have left it as it was left in this text.

~Miss Mandy 

  
Ant_222  #570446  Thu, 25 Sep 08 10:18 PM
Thank you, MissMandy, for your help and for the tree you sent me!
  
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service