Cloning - fix the mistake and tell the sentence you aren't understanding.

   Share on Facebook  
Anonymous  #453725  Sun, 16 Dec 07 02:31 PM
Cloning is the process of creating an identical copy of something.
Cloning a cell
means to derive a population of cells from a single cell. A clone shares all the genetic characteristics of the original cell. However, we must differentiate between the scientific definition and the definition of the general public

In fact, when we talk about cloning in the general public, they immediately think about the technique is to create an individual with the help of stem cells. While scientists speak of clones from the moment two cells have the same genetic heritage. They distinguish between clone "in vivo" when it comes to individuals and clones "ex vivo" when it is simply cells.

Thus according to the scientific definition, contrary to what we may think, cloning is something that has existed for a long time and is widely practiced in nature. Indeed, for example in humans, the cells renew themselves by multiplying at the same: it’s the mitosis.

 After fertilization, we can also observe the phenomenon of cloning: Initially there is a cell that makes mitoses then each cell specializes in a spot to give cells in the heart, brain, eyes… Cloning is a completely natural phenomenon.

 As for manipulation by human cloning, contrary to popular belief, it is also long overdue. Indeed, first in plants, cloning results in the plant cuttings: in taking a rod and the replanting creates a new plant, which have exactly the same genetic inheritance, it is a clone.

 Dolly, a female sheep was the first mammal to be cloned from an adult somatic cell, using the process of nuclear transfer.

The technique of cloning provides a solution for the survival of endangered species. So in January 2001, on a farm in Iowa was born wild ox. Noah is the first clone obtained from the cells of an animal in danger of extinction. It will still required 700 eggs from cow to arrive at the result.

 But is striving to repopulate the species almost extinct from a very low genetic diversity? Will extend the feat in recreating species disappeared completely as the Tasmanian tiger that some would like to see revived?

 Cloning is another solution to treat certain diseases such as Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's. They may treat spinal cord sections, something that has been practiced successfully in rats. And the risks of rejection are virtually non-existent because the stem cells come from the individual treaty. So thanks to cloned cells, we can cure diseases still very poorly controlled nowadays…

 Cloning is also as a solution to the sterility of a couple. Currently, the couple use of donated gametes: The child who is born, has a genetic heritage sometimes totally different if both spouses are sterile. Now, thanks to cloning, it would be enough to charge cell nuclear any of the couple and the child that would result corresponds to a combination genetic quite random and unique.

 There are many problems caused by cloning. Firstly, there are difficulties associated with the birth and survival of clones. We found an aging faster than normal at Dolly.
  Moreover, although theoretically the cloning appears to be a simple technique is well known, obtaining a clone is difficult. For example, Dolly was born after 300 attempts.

 
Transplantation of organs and tissue from animals to humans is dangerous. Studies show that retroviruses are believed to be at transplatation.

 In addition, although cloning is establishing itself as the solution to species extinction, it can also lead to the disappearance of a species. Indeed, the survival of a species through the centuries is based on the diversity of their genetic heritage: the rich heritage, allows a person to be better armed to deal with viruses and epidemics.

 Finally, it seems that all the advantages offered by cloning seem to be totally utopian: all these notions are still largely inaccessible today. However, although all applications are still within the realm of dreams, those ideas are necessary for the progress of science and to guide the research. Unfortunately, at present, there seems to be more disadvantages than advantages to practice cloning.

 
In addition to these technical problems, the most important problems are the ethical issues such as cloning a deceased child, the concept of eternal life and of course the fear Drift…

 Finally, many moral questions are raised today about the cloning. What are the limits of cloning? And what impact can lead to the human race? All these questions, of course, the slow development of technology and research, but one of the essential elements of these discussions is to avoid any blunders that could have irreversible consequences on humans. That is why all this is necessary. Indeed, they enable scientists to be aware of the dangers and risks they can to avoid slippage. In addition, they can also lead to better research as required… These ethical issues no longer act as an indispensable guide rather than a brake.



Thank for your help

  
Clive  #453911  Mon, 17 Dec 07 02:43 AM

Hi,

I don't have time to look at all of this, but I will offer you some changes to the first part.

Cloning is the process of creating an identical copy of something.
Cloning a cell
means to derive a population of cells from a single cell. A clone shares all the genetic characteristics of the original cell. However, we must differentiate between the scientific definition and the definition of the general public

When the general public talk about cloning, they immediately think the technique is to create an individual with the help of stem cells. However, scientists speak of clones from the moment two cells have the same genetic heritage. They distinguish between a clone "in vivo" when it comes to individuals and clones "ex vivo" when they are simply cells.

Thus, according to the scientific definition and contrary to what we may think, cloning is something that has existed for a long time and is widely practiced in nature. Indeed, for example in humans, cells renew themselves by multiplying simulateously. This is mitosis.

You might wish to consider saying 'laymen' rather than the general public'. In the last paragraph, do you mean 'simultaneously' or 'spontaneously'?

Best wishes, Clive

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Thu, Oct 28 2004
Canada
Veteran Member (23,116)
ModeratorTeachers
El tango argentino es un pensamiento triste que se puede bailar (The tango argentino is a sad thought which can be danced) Enrique Santos Discépolo
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL Essay, Writing World
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service