1 2
My assistant believes that one should always place a comma after a date in a sentance. I was always tought to place a comma after a date when the date is used as part of a prepositional phrase. However, I can't say that I was the best student. For instance, would one put a comma after the year of the date in the following sentance: Your August 13, 2002 letter gave no indication of your intentions.

Thanks for the input
New Member01
Commas are awful, aren't they?

Here, 'August 13, 2002' is an adjective modifying 'letter', so we do not want a comma after the year.

In 'On August 13, 2002, Jonathan Forbush ran the 3-minute mile', the comma marks the end of the adverbial phrase, and is needed to set it off from the main clause.

My feeling-- and practice-- and teaching-- is that the bottom line on comma use is clarity. The function of a comma is to clarify the relationships of the various clauses and phrases in the sentence. Not enough commas confuses, too many look cluttered and redundant. They should be helpers, not hindrances, and deployed as such.

As far as dates are concerned, I have taken to presenting them in the increasingly acceptable format of '13 August 2002'.

Hope this helps.
Veteran Member92,289
SystemAdministrator: A system administrator takes care of the inner workings of the entire system. These users have the ability to promote, ban and modify other users.Teachers: Users in this role are certified teachers. This may include DELTA, CELTA, TESOL, TEFL qualified professionals. Email a scan of your qualification to an admin, if you wish to be considered.
Anonymous:
thanks for posting this - I have been looking for this answer for a long time!
Anonymous:
I was wondering if the grammar is correct to type a date with the "th" followed by a comma in a sentence as follows: November 28th, 2007.
It's a matter of style. You'll find many opinions on this. Just be consistent.
Veteran Member27,513
Proficient Speaker: Users in this role are known to maintain an excellent grasp of the English language. You can only be promoted to this role by the Englishforums team.Retired Moderator: A moderator who has retired.Trusted Users: Trusted users are allowed to use additional capabilities of the site such as private messaging to all users and various other advanced features. You cannot join this role unless you are promoted by an administrator.
Anonymous:
Yes, you would put a comma after the year.
Anonymous:
Your assistant is right. The sentence should read: Your August 13, 2002, letter gave no indication of your intentions.
As I said back when this was first post (QUITE a while ago), it's a matter of style, not grammar. I always put the comma after the year (just as I do for the state) but it's not a universal style to do so.
Proficient Speaker: Users in this role are known to maintain an excellent grasp of the English language. You can only be promoted to this role by the Englishforums team.Retired Moderator: A moderator who has retired.Trusted Users: Trusted users are allowed to use additional capabilities of the site such as private messaging to all users and various other advanced features. You cannot join this role unless you are promoted by an administrator.
Anonymous:
The comma rule in question here is not a matter of sylistic choice. It is a tested rule in many state tests that public school students must pass. In the sample sentence given above, a comma is necessary. Send your letter before September 30, 2009, to our office. No comma is necessary if only the month and year are used. Your September 2009 issue of our magazine should arrive soon.

Now that people are having to be their own editors, correct use of conventions has declined drastically. Even newspapers like the New York Times contain many more errors than in days past when people made a living being copy editors.
Show more
Live chat
Registered users can join here