con/a--glomerate

   Share on Facebook  
maverick88  #126903  Sun, 14 Aug 05 02:40 PM

Can anyone please tell me the difference between 'conglomerate' and 'agglomerate'?

Thanks

  
Top 100 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Nov 22 2004
Israel
Regular Member (695)
An English learner
Clive  #126928  Sun, 14 Aug 05 04:29 PM

Hi,

These words can be used as nouns / verbs /adjectives. They have specialized geological meanings, as well as more common meanings.

conglomerate means to collect together into a mass where the parts are separate but well stuck together. We commonly refer to a business witn many different subsidiary companies as a conglomerate.

agglomerate is a word I have never heard in my life. I looked it up and it means a mass where the parts are stuck together in a disorderly kind of way. It's the opposite of conglomerate.

Best wishes, Clive

 

 

 

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Thu, Oct 28 2004
Canada
Veteran Member (22,254)
ModeratorTeachers
El tango argentino es un pensamiento triste que se puede bailar (The tango argentino is a sad thought which can be danced) Enrique Santos Discépolo
davkett  #126930  Sun, 14 Aug 05 04:49 PM

Hi Clive,

I would assume that the two words are 'opposite' only in the sense of the order/disorder among their stuck-together parts.  I believe the two terms are considered similar, in respect to the fact that both conglomerates and agglomerates are comprised of parts that retain separate identities.

  
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on Tue, Jun 7 2005
Pennsylvania, USA
Senior Member (2,788)
Proficient Speaker
"The rose stays fresh in its name..." -Bernard of Morlay
maverick88  #126936  Sun, 14 Aug 05 04:55 PM

Hey Clive.

Yes, as I thought, the difference is hidden in the texture or order of the 'lump'.

"I looked it up and it means a mass where the parts are stuck together in a disorderly kind of way. It's the opposite of conglomerate."

I suppose you didn't mean by this they're complete antonyms...Just the so called sub-meaning a but differs methinks Smile [:)]

  
Clive  #126942  Sun, 14 Aug 05 05:05 PM

Hi,

Yes, opposite in that sense. The oppositeness lies in the prefixes, from Latin, where con is 'with' and a is 'from'.

We see this pairing in other words, such as congregate and aggregate. Interestingly, these two also relate to groupings, from the Latin word for flock or crowd which is also the root of a word like gregarious.  

I don't recollect encountering 'agglomerate', have you? Clive

  
davkett  #126947  Sun, 14 Aug 05 05:10 PM
'Agglomeration' and 'conglomeration' would be very useful critical terms for an artist working with collage.  Hey, that's me!
  
Clive  #126952  Sun, 14 Aug 05 05:29 PM

Hi,

I think 'glomus' is Latin for 'a ball', so you'd really have to be making something rounded, so perhaps aggregate/congregate would be better for a flat surface.

Hey, let's congregate for a drink sometime. We'll have a glomus (glomum?). Clive

 

  
davkett  #126959  Sun, 14 Aug 05 05:50 PM

I think 'glomus' is Latin for 'a ball'

Excellent point, Clive.  'Aggregate' and 'congregate' are more appropriate to flat work. 

When I've taught a studio class in collage, however, I always approached the word ('collage') as a principle of organization.  That approach allowed students of various disciplines, like sculpture, film, painting, even some music majors, to feel at home in the same 'studio'.

  
maverick88  #126964  Sun, 14 Aug 05 06:13 PM
Thank you everybody I got it!
  
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service