[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


1 2
Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Sun, Sep 3 2006 2:32 PM by FRANKLY SPEAKING. 15 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
MIA6  +  261145 Wed, 30 Aug 06 09:21 PM

  I want to know: Could a sentence in the present perfect tense has different meanings under different contexts? I don't really think so. It's like in every native english speaker's mind, in their concepts, there is only one answer for some kinds of typical sentences no matter what context is, since the context would also let you feel that way. I can give you two examples. I think they are typical sentences in the present perfect tense:1) When a person says: I have eaten a chicken. Even though you don't have context, you will think that it means he already ate it . That sentence has only this one meaning. You will not think that it means he ate it, and he is still eating it. Then If he gives you a context, I think the context would also let you feel that it means He already ate it. But if he tries to express that he is still eating it (the second meaning),then you must feel so weird that this person expressed wrongly. 2) I have never been to England. No context for you now. You must think it means I didn't go to England before, and now I am still not there; From past to now, I have never been there.  I think you don't really need context to understand the Use of this sentence.  However, If i give you a context. Suppose that we are both now in England, and i say to you: "This country is nice, I have never been here."  Then, you must feel so weird, because in your mind, "I have never been here" means .... (I already said above).  So you may correct me:"you need to say 'I have never been here BEFORE' ".  [I am not so sure about this example, because my teacher told me "I have never been to England" mean I didn't go there before. So i can say this sentence when I AM in England right now]   But i think you can get my point now? If you don't agree with my thought, then you mean a sentence (two sentences i gave above) has different meanings under different contexts? I hope you can solve my confusion.  Thanks a lot!

Joined on Sat, Mar 4 2006
Full Member 223
Marius Hancu  +  261150 Wed, 30 Aug 06 09:46 PM
>"you need to say 'I have never been here BEFORE'

To me, it's a matter of logic.

If you're in England now, you should say:
I have never been in England BEFORE.
because you're contradicting the "never been" with your very presence at this moment.

If you're NOT in England now, you should say:
I have never been  in England.

See here such a change (not availabe before/available now):

-------
Televised footage for many luxury destinations has never been readily
available before
but through the internationally acclaimed sister
production, The Luxury Travel Show - which airs in the UK, USA, Asia
and throughout Europe, there is now a pool of exclusive material. The
Luxury Holiday Show will offer all the latest deals in the luxury
sector as well as added value.
------

From BBC:
------
Crowning a week of stunning images of the planets taken by the Hubble
Space Telescope comes Uranus as it has never been seen before [but it is being seen now M.H.]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/193983.stm
------

Joined on Wed, Apr 26 2006
Veteran Member 11,673
MIA6  +  261154 Wed, 30 Aug 06 10:15 PM
Hi, Marius Hancu. I agree with your opinion.  And you answer is just my point: "If you're NOT in England now, you should say:
I have never been  in England. "  
    So i mean that's a kind of common sense in some english speaker's thought.  You would hardly to accpet that If you are in England now, you say: I have never been to England.    It would be weird. So i think a sentence which is sort of typical in present perfect tense do not have different meanings under different contexts.
Maple  +  261156 Wed, 30 Aug 06 10:24 PM

How about using had on this occasion??

Suppose:

 I'm in England now, and I want to say this is the first time for me to be in England. I would say:

I had never been here before.

Joined on Tue, Jul 11 2006
An ESL student in China
Contributing Member 1,110
Marius Hancu  +  261159 Wed, 30 Aug 06 10:35 PM
 Maple wrote:

How about using had on this occasion??

Suppose:

 I'm in England now, and I want to say this is the first time for me to be in England. I would say:

I had never been here before.

No.  In the examples provided by the original poster, the reference moment is now, not some moment in past time, for which you could've used had, as in:

The Woodlanders by Hardy, Thomas - Chapter 44
After this there was confidence between them--such confidence as
there had never been before.

Daniel Deronda by Eliot, George - Chapter 52
... susceptibility in her, and made her alive as she had never been before to the relations Deronda must have with that society which she herself was ...


Maple, 3 yr 88 days ago

Maybe I've mixed it up with "That had happened long before"

I'll think it over.Smile [:)]

Thank you MH!Star [star]

Goodman  +  261185 Thu, 31 Aug 06 12:21 AM
 Maple wrote:

How about using had on this occasion??

Suppose:

 I'm in England now, and I want to say this is the first time for me to be in England. I would say:

I had never been here before.

Maple,Smile [:)]

You can say “I had never been to China before until my parents took me there on vacation two years ago”. The rule of thumb in using past perfect is that one must use a little logic to analyze the sequence of events. The structure must have 2 events which took place in the past and one must precede the other, and these events are no longer ongoing.

Here, aample structure is: 1) I had never gone to China all my life. (until)  2) my parent took me there two years ago. Please note, Often in reporting style writing, the writer presumes that the readers understand the contexts and omits the second event.

Example: If I were talking to someone about my past, I could say “I had never learned English as a Child. Omitted and presumed understood: when I lived in Hong Kong.

I hope I am not confusing you

Joined on Mon, Nov 7 2005
Senior Member 3,816
The name says it all!
Maple  +  261285 Thu, 31 Aug 06 07:23 AM

Hi, GoodmanSmile [:)]

I'm sorry I still have a confusionEmbarrassed [:$]

How about using had on this occasion??

Suppose:

 I'm in England now, and I want to say this is the first time for me to be in England. I would say:

I had never been here before.

According to the  implicit "second event" rule (Let me call it a rule for a moment)

"I had never been here before." is right, because it can be read as "I had never been here before the day (you know) I arrived here.

Marius Hancu  +  261346 Thu, 31 Aug 06 11:22 AM
In my opinion:
I had never been here before yesterday
Correct.
I had never been here before this time/now.  Incorrect, one must use present perfect ("have been") here.
1 2
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.