Hi, everybody!
Maybe I should have started with "well," but I can ensure you that I'm the original poster, while this guy
Anonymous wrote: |
|
Well, I have a half-finished game of noughts and crosses tattooed on my forehead. If you do too, then I guess...
|
|
is not (but I found his/her post amusing!
)
First, I'd like to thank those who have really answered my question. The topic was not "Guess who I am" but to what extent anomimity in answering questions can be useful both to the questioner (will s/he tend to rely less on the answer?) and to the community (could it avoid useless quarrels?).
Pucca wrote: |
|
And going back to the topic..an anonimous post would be helpful if you want to ask something but you don't want others to see who is asking so.
|
|
Let me disagree with you. If the community can se who is asking a certain question, the answer will probably be better tailored to specific needs and interests. For instance, if Kooyeen (by the way, sorry for misspelling your nick!
) posts a question about present perfect, he will probably receive more answers related to AmE than I would, because everybody knows that "he's learning American English"!
My point was exactly the opposite: while anonimity is NEVER useful in asking, it could be in answering.
Kooyeen wrote: |
| Ok, point no.1: my English is not good at all, I'm learning and I ask questions, but I also try to answer to other posts. I do it mainly because I think it helps me try to express myself. Plus, answering questions, I can share what I know, and in that way if I have learned something wrong, I can easily get corrected. And trying to answer questions I often end up asking, instead. |
|
This is a very good point.
Kooyeen wrote: |
| Point no.3: as I already said in some thread, I always and only rely on native speakers. I don't even trust proficient members or advanced learners. Only natives. This doesn't mean I don't want their opinions or that I think their English is not good. I just think that in every thread, in order to be considered "resolved", there have to be some native's replies. This comes from the way I see grammar, that in my opinion should only be "descriptive". |
|
I completely agree. I've studied English grammar extensively, and although I still make too many mistakes, I'm not concerned about them. Whenever I have a doubt on grammar and vocabulary, I always search by myself.
What I really, really lack is the feeling for what would be the natural way to express a complex idea, and this is whay I prefer receiving answers from natives. I don't want to resemble one of those dusty, ancient grammar books you can find in a library!
Pucca wrote: |
| I have another suggestion about that person! I clicked on "not readed", and saw a name which was pretty similar, I started to read his posts and..Bingo! I thnk it's him! He posted a paragraph and Philip didn't find any mistakes..so, in conclusion, that Anon wasn't you either MrP! |
|
Sorry, but I think you're barking up the wrong tree! ![Big Smile [:D]](/emoticons/emotion-2.gif)