We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Thu, Jul 10 2008 8:59 PM by New2grammar. 4 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
New2grammar  +  539482 Thu, 10 Jul 08 08:32 PM
Police are seeing high tech criminal rings with highly secured networks being infiltrated for personal gains. The conventional way of fighting crime with weapons are completely powerless to stop these cyber criminal activities.

Are there any mistakes?
Thanks.
Joined on Tue, Nov 21 2006
Veteran Member 7,676
Who wants to go sailing around the world with me?
Grammar Geek  +  539485 Thu, 10 Jul 08 08:37 PM

Hi N2G

Police are seeing high tech criminal rings with highly secured networks being infiltrated for personal gains. The criminal rings have the higly secured networks? Who is infiltraing them? Who is gaining?

The conventional way {I'd use "method"} of fighting crime with weapons {perhaps you mean fire-arms -- surely having cyber-sleuths gives law enforcement a different type of weapon.} is completely ineffectivepowerless to stop in stopping these cyber criminals activities.

Joined on Tue, Jan 10 2006
Veteran Member 19,660
Barbara, who answers in American English. My housekeeping skills attest to the truth of the second law of thermodynamics: Left to themselves, things get more and more random!
New2grammar  +  539488 Thu, 10 Jul 08 08:43 PM

Police are seeing high tech criminal rings, with highly secured networks being infiltrated for personal gains.

I feel 'with' could be interpreted in two different ways: 1: the possession of whatever comes before it, in this case, criminal rings. 2. an example of the subject. I think the latter requires a comma.

To answer your questions. (The quote function is not working :( )

The criminal rings have the higly secured networks?  no. Criminal rights are infiltrating secured networks.

Who is infiltraing them?   Criminals

Who is gaining? Criminals

Grammar Geek  +  539497 Thu, 10 Jul 08 08:55 PM

Then say "high-tech criminal rings that are infiltrating highly securted networks.  (No need to say "for personal gains." Why else would they be criminals?)

New2grammar  +  539500 Thu, 10 Jul 08 08:59 PM
Thanks, GG. Is the following OK? I'm learning how to use with.

Police are seeing an increased in criminal activities, with a growing number of secured networks being infiltrated including ATM networks.

© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.