Didn't, needn't (Guest:Vincent)

   Share on Facebook  
Guest  #1303  Wed, 25 Jun 03 04:50 PM
What is the difference between:

He didn't need to go to the meeting

and

He need'nt have gone to the meeting
  
tam  #1304  Wed, 25 Jun 03 05:39 PM
He didn't need to go to the meeting means it was not necessary for him to attend so he did not go.

He needn't have gone to the meeting means he went to the meeting but it was pointless him being there so he should not have go.

In other words the second is said after the fact. Hope that helps!
  
Not Ranked
Joined on Fri, Mar 21 2003
Junior Member (53)
Jacko  #1342  Thu, 26 Jun 03 04:52 AM
Or let's say, both sentences say that it was not necessary for him to go to the meeting, but with "didn't need," he either went or not; it was uncertain. However, with "needn't have gone," it is certain that he went to the meeting. Be aware though, that if you use proper grammar, you shouldn't have used "needn't" because if you remove the contraction it would be "need not," wherein it's supposed to be "needed not."
  
Top 500 Contributor
Joined on Fri, Jun 20 2003
Full Member (215)
kris38  #103748  Sun, 29 May 05 04:39 AM
I agree
  
Not Ranked
Joined on Tue, May 24 2005
New Member (17)
nona the brit  #103761  Sun, 29 May 05 06:49 AM
I think it is short for 'he need not have...
  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Sep 22 2004
England
Veteran Member (11,450)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
The name says it all.
kris38  #105757  Sun, 05 Jun 05 12:28 PM

Tom and Nona the brit, both are correct as per my understanding.

Kris38
  
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service