Die because of ...

   Share on Facebook  
Seraphin  #552285  Thu, 07 Aug 08 09:37 PM
there are probably NO rules to this -
and from a post back in 2005, there were some discussions on the usage of "die because of"

it was stated that the usage of "die because of" in general is wrong.

For example, "he died because of cancer" is wrong

But what about ?? "he died because of the lesion" ??
  
Top 500 Contributor
Joined on Sat, Feb 9 2008
Full Member (146)
CalifJim  #552343  Fri, 08 Aug 08 01:26 AM
Seraphin
But what about ?? "he died because of the lesion" ??
I find it better than "died of the lesion", because a lesion is not a disease.  Typically die of is followed by the name of a disease.  (died of cancer, died of liver disease, ...)  But you can also die of a wound or wounds, or an infection, or starvation.  And you can also refer metaphorically to emotional states as if they were diseases.  (died of heartbreak, died of loneliness, died of embarrassment, etc.)

You are right that there are no rules.  It's a matter of what combinations of words are normally said by native speakers. 

CJ 

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member (17,714)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
Mr Wordy  #552344  Fri, 08 Aug 08 01:30 AM

For medical conditions or injuries, "because of" sounds odd, and it's better to use the words "of", "from", "as a result of", etc., as appropriate:

He died as a result of the lesion.
He died from his injuries.
He died of pneumonia.

In other cases, "because of" can be OK. For example:

He died because of what he knew.

  
Top 75 Contributor
Joined on Tue, May 27 2008
Regular Member (960)
Proficient Speaker
Native British English speaker
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service