Difference between would and will?

   Share on Facebook  
Anonymous  #233819  Thu, 08 Jun 06 10:30 AM

Hi,

I am new at this community but it looks very great. I am studying Economiecs in Vienna but I have big problems with the grammar at exam. I failed already 3 times.

What is the difference between Would have doubled or will have doubled?

Example (taken from an exam):

Indeed,, last year Solvedt told one interviewer that Denpack's turnover would have doubled within a five-year period from the time of their discussion.

Why can't I say "will have doubled"?

Is the reason because the sentence is in past?

Thank you for any reply.

  
Ruslana  #233834  Thu, 08 Jun 06 11:09 AM
 Anonymous wrote:
Indeed,, last year Solvedt told one interviewer that Denpack's turnover would have doubled within a five-year period from the time of their discussion.

Why can't I say "will have doubled"?

Is the reason because the sentence is in past?

The reason is that the main clause verb ("told") is in the past. It is sequence of tenses.

  
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on Sat, Dec 17 2005
Russia
Senior Member (3,197)
Moderator
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace", - Jimi Hendrix
Marius Hancu  #233836  Thu, 08 Jun 06 11:22 AM
IMO, this is indirect/reported speech (said) and conditionals (would)

In direct speech, Solvedt says at the time of the interview:
"I think that Denpack turnover would double within five years from today. "
(I don't think he's certain about it)


In reported speech in the past:
Last year Solvedt told one interviewer that Denpack's turnover would have doubled within a five-year period from the time of their discussion.

-------------
After past reporting verbs, conditional sentences referring to "unreal" situations are often reported with past conditionals.

Direct: If I had any money I'd buy you a drink.
Indirect: She said if she had had any money she would have bought me a drink. (
or She said if she had any money she would buy ...)

Swan, Practical English Usage, p. 482
--------------



  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Apr 26 2006
Montreal, Canada
Veteran Member (11,673)
Proficient Speaker
Anonymous  #510993  Wed, 07 May 08 11:25 PM

Yes, it is, becasue it is in the past.

  
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service