I agree with MH on this. I wouldn't say it is absolutely incorrect but I would avoid it in these circumstances.

To me, 'due to' has a negative result -for example 'due to the appalling traffic, I was late for my appointment; Due to your incompetence, we lost the order; Due to different fowarding regulations, the package went missing between the two countries' and so on.

Due to also needs a clear and direct connection between the cause and effect. You have probably learned to cooperate with different people for more reasons than just different regulations. You have these good qualities for more reasons than just moving companies.

Dear nona-the-brit and Mr. Micawber,

thank you very much for your help, I really appreciate it and will change the sentence.

Yours, Julia

Ah! I see-- 'my ability to cooperate... is due to my experience'; 'my ability to offer my extended language skills... is due to my work experience'.

Actually, I vaguely remember that rule-- if only you guys hadn't weaned me from my Fowler & Fowler so abruptly...

My understanding is that 'due to' in these examples is 'correct':

1. 'Cancellations due to the lack of a driver are all too common these days.'
2. 'The cancellation was due to the lack of a driver.'

But 'incorrect' in these:

3. 'Due to the lack of a driver, the 1105 to Waterloo has been cancelled.'
4. 'The 1105 to Waterloo has been cancelled, due to the lack of a driver.'

The reason usually given is that 'due' is not a preposition, but an adjective, and so must relate to a noun or pronoun. It can’t relate to an idea (in this case, ‘the cancellation of the 1105’) that's merely implicit in the sentence.

In sentences #3 and #4, for instance, 'due' is properly in apposition to 'the 1105' ('the 1105 [that is] due to the lack of a driver').

It's similar to the argument against 'dangling participles'.

That said, it seems to me that the same objection could be made to 'owing to', which is often recommended as a replacement:

5. 'Owing to the lack of a driver, the 1105 to Waterloo has been cancelled' (i.e. 'the 1105 is owing to the lack of a driver').

Which leaves us with the option of replacing every dangling 'due to' and 'owing to' with 'because of'. Not an attractive proposition/preposition.

But if money or a job depended on my letter, I would probably combine a little of NtB's reasoning with a little of MH's:

a) in BrE at least, the misplaced 'due to' is most commonly met with in the curious dialect of station announcers, and so may have unpleasant associations for the reader;

b) the 99.5% who are blithely unaware of the problem won't take exception if your grammar is 'correct'; whereas the 0.5% who are pedants will if it's not.

MrP

PS: I'm not sure why Mark Israel in link#2 describes the disputed 'due to' as an adverb; it seems to be acting like a compound preposition. (But then, a prepositional phrase can behave adverbially.)
PPS: Using 'as a result of (my experience, etc)' would avoid the problem, in Julietta's context.