Hi,
I think a proper name (I think a name is a proper noun) like Joe can take an adjective but attaching some adjectives creates a need for an article and some do not.
good Joe is on the run.
A jubilant/sad Joe is on the run.
See, to me, 'jubilant and sad' create a need for an article, in this being an indefinite one, whereas the use of 'good' has not. I think it is on the nature and semantic meaning of the words involved.
I think I can adorn 'Joe' with an article and an adjective like 'good' if I make a context that exhibits type differentiation like this.
A good Joe is on the run, where as a bad Joe, which is what he used be is resting at home.
I think the same principles? method? can be applied to an uncountable noun like the word 'happiness'.
Low-degree happiness is possible when your life revolves around mundane routines without anything extraordinary.
But if I attach a different adjective with a different feel to it a need for an article is apparent.
An all-consuming happiness is one that doesn't come very often to a normal person, in my opinion.
See, whatever that 'all-consuming' mean in that context, the nature or semantic meaning of the words 'all-consuming' created a need for an article. It can be arisen by contexct, IMO, too like the name.
A happiness I felt when my long dog friend found a mate and bore a puppy.was unlike any happiness I felt until that time.
In summary, I think this method? can be applied to most of the proper names like *** Street and *** Stadium, the ones that normally do not take articles. Am I right?