We have a wide variety of direct marketing options available, contact us here for more info.

We have a wide variety of direct marketing options available, contact us here for more info.
1 2 3 4 5
Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Wed, Mar 7 2007 11:46 AM by Anonymous. 41 replies.
| |
Industrious100  +  37952 Sun, 18 Jul 04 07:21 AM
I am looking for a good online free online grammar software, grammar checker other than microsoft word. Any clue?
Joined on Wed, Jul 14 2004
New Member 13
Ollie Veradi  +  40680 Tue, 03 Aug 04 09:55 PM
There is a very similar question to yours on this forum. My answer then was:

"I have yet to find grammar software that works. As they can still only perform mathematical checks of words and sentences, grammar checkers tend to miss lots of errors and often suggest wrong versions. Microsoft's grammar checker is doubtless a brilliant piece of programming, but it misses around 70% of errors in my experience.

Here is a test piece:

I know a girl. The girls' coat is blue.

Now, as we all know, the apostrophe should be before the "s" in "girls" as the coat belongs to only one girl - as is clear from context. However, as "girls' coat" is feasible as a stand-alone phrase, grammar checkers will ignore it. I could rattle off countless examples like this one, which leave grammar checkers floundering at the bottom of the class!

Unfortunately, the only way to prevent grammar errors is learn grammar. Unlike spell checkers (which are - let's face it - brilliant), modern grammar checkers are full of holes - huge ones.

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

You might want to have a look at www.grammar-monster.com (There is a short article there about grammar checkers and a few cool tests too.)"
Joined on Tue, Aug 3 2004
New Member 13
Eleana  +  41750 Wed, 11 Aug 04 06:52 PM
well I would love to have one... and even the human grammar checker won't work... ask three people a grammar question and you might get three different answers. Including the one I hate the most: don't worry, we understand you. GRRRRRRRRRR!
Joined on Wed, Jun 30 2004
New Member 05
Anonymous, 4 yr 135 days ago
If you know his adress I would be grateful if you phoned me? Is this correct sentence
NoLeafClover, 4 yr 100 days ago
Absolutely correct Wink [;)]
Anonymous, 4 yr 83 days ago

Very true...nothing can replace human brain!!!

btw I got a question...

He is said to have had connection with criminals.

He is said to have been a part of our company.

could anyone tell me if these sentences are correct?

Waiting for your valuable input, thank you very muchSmile [:)]

 

Regards

Sherlock

X11  +  160499 Sat, 19 Nov 05 10:27 PM

Hi.

I believe that the first one is correct, but the second one should go like this;

He is said to have been part of our company

I'm almost positive that there should not be an article before part..

regards

X11
Joined on Tue, Nov 1 2005
Aarhus, Denmark
Full Member 120
Teahupoo - A Spectacle Beyond Imagination
Anonymous, 4 yr 65 days ago

 Industrious100 wrote:
I am looking for a good grammar checker other than microsoft word. Any clue?

 

Support is offered round the clock all through the year.

MrPedantic  +  167359 Wed, 07 Dec 05 06:44 PM

Correct versions:

"He is said to have had a connection with criminals."

"He is said to have been a part of our company."

MrP

Joined on Tue, Oct 12 2004
Veteran Member 12,679
...opella forensis / adducit febris...
1 2 3 4 5
© MediaCet Ltd. 2010, v5.0.3678.29593. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.