Grammar Granny wrote: |
| I was told by a professional editor that 'for free' was incorrect, no matter how much it is in common use. |
|
They must have a strange definition of "incorrect".
In the first place it is redundant.
|
|
Redundancy needs some better PR. These are all redundant:
three
different ways
start
over againThese five passages have not been picked
out because they are especially bad... I number them so that I can refer
back to them - Orwell, Politics and the English Language
There are places where we cannot substitute "free" for "for free". Well we can, but it gives a different meaning:
1a It seemed best to find a way to live for free.
1b It seemed best to find a way to live free
2a The hat they throw in extra for free
2b The hat they throw in extra free
3a They will have the run of the inn for free
3b They will have the run of the inn free
The b sentences all have different meanings than their a counterparts.
Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage says "This idiom is well established in general prose, and you can safely disregard the objections. It is not used in writings of high solemnity, however." (page 458)