We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!
Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cool Breeze
+
691557
Fri, 27 Mar 09 10:34 AM
ISU_152“Many Russians too - as example remember flowers, with were estonian people welcomed soviet troops”
I visited Tallinn in 1976 for the first time because my Estonian friend wasn't allowed to leave the Soviet Union and visit me. She told me watching Finnish television was her only entertainment and that she was certain the Soviet rule would never end. I consoled her by telling her that so far in history, no tyranny had lasted forever. We couldn't of course talk about things like this in public places, only in her flat. Now the tyranny and fear are over!
I assume Russian historians also contend that Finns gave flowers to invading Russians 200 years ago? And we probably gave roses to Russian troops on 30th November 1939 when Stalin began bombing Finland? Helsinki was targeted twice on that day.
By the same logic, Russians gave flowers to Hitler's troops when they invaded the Soviet Union, right?
CB
Joined on
Fri, Apr 7 2006
Senior Member
3,965
"I hope you'll all live to be 150 years old - and the last voice you hear is mine!" Frank Sinatra on stage in Oslo, Norway, 28 September 1991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISU_152
+
691572
Fri, 27 Mar 09 11:44 AM
Flowers - is historical fact . And 8 estonian rifleman`s corps - 32 000 estonian volonters in Red Army - is historical facts too. Nine hero of the soviet union , many cavalier of another soviet medals - he was really brave men`s. For compare - naci can enlist only 15 000 man for Estonian legion SS and when both regiment meet in the battle - naci was be forced to run like lighting (best voting bu my option). Today sons of naci rule in Estonia and write a book`s , trying to rehabilitate his fathers Why most part of estonian people in that time prefered Stalin more , than his former goverment - is question to the goverment . may be estonians leaders in that time be not so wise than marhal Mannerhaim ?
Joined on
Tue, May 22 2007
Full Member
197
Anarchy - order’s mother
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cool Breeze
+
692132
Sun, 29 Mar 09 11:28 AM
ISU_152“Flowers - is historical fact ”
Unfortunately your English is so inadequate that I just don't understand everything you say, ISU. Hitler and Stalin, the two major dictators involved in World War II, had divided eastern Europe among themselves before the war began. Finland and the Baltic states were supposed to be Stalin's territory. It is of course possible that a handful of people gave flowers to the invading Russians, but naturally the majority of Estonians wanted to remain independent and not be ruled by Stalin, who had already killed millions of Soviets in the 30s. People were justly scared to death of him. You can read about the pact here.
Germans suffered from mental anguish on account of Hitler's atrocities long after the war was over; perhaps some still do, even though modern Germans are not to blame for what Hitler did and what many Germans believed in in those days. The situation in Russia is different: the rulers make believe and many people believe that the Soviet Union's reputation is unblemished, that Stalin never attacked a foreign country. This killer of at least 20 million Soviet people is hailed as a hero by many Russians. The situation is tragic and very sad, and is unlikely to improve the image Russia has abroad.
The Russians may persuade themselves to believe whatever they like but that won't change historical facts. For that to happen, Russian leaders would have to eat humble pie. I don't see that happening. The deception persists.
CB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISU_152
+
692477
Mon, 30 Mar 09 10:59 AM
Cool Breeze“Unfortunately your English is so inadequate that I just don't understand everything you say, ”
Sorry. What error i made ? Cool Breeze“Hitler and Stalin, the two major dictators involved in World War II, had divided eastern Europe among themselves ”
On Paris conferention in 3 december 1917 British and Franse had divide Russia аmong temselves On Munch conferention in 1938 British and Franse goverment allow Hitler and Poland Leader Edward Rydz-Śmigły to divide Czechoslovakia among themselves http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_AgreementSorry -as saying russian proverb Neighbouring with wolves - howl like wolves Cool Breeze“ but naturally the majority of Estonians wanted to remain independent and not be ruled by Stalin”
- somebody trying to calculate ? Sorry but when i look on one side massiv of declassifed documents like this : http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=_t&hl=ru&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.svr.gov.ru%2Fmaterial%2Fpribaltica.htm&sl=ru&tl=en&history_state0= (sorry, i can`t found this in english ) and on another side many publications with terrible accusations but without prove ( or with proves , which failure had been clear long time ago ) i belive the first side. As example excellent monografy about Stalin`s repression published in 1991 year in Russia - Zemskov - Statistical analiz of Repression - somebody on the west try to argue ? no , he prefer do non translate "unpolitcorreсеt" book . In 2006 year SVR (external spy service) published set of desecreted documents of NKVD about situation in Baltic states - but i can not found this in english . somedody forgot to translate uncomfortable dokuments . and same situation with many books and many autors. As result - we have discussion between blind one and deaf one
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cool Breeze
+
692531
Mon, 30 Mar 09 02:12 PM
ISU_152“ Cool Breeze“ but naturally the majority of Estonians wanted to remain independent and not be ruled by Stalin”
- somebody trying to calculate ? ”
No one is or was trying to count any votes. Stalin set up a puppet government in Estonia and understandably it never organised an election. Consequently it was not possible to count the votes as none were cast.
Fortunately he didn't succeed in invading Finland. During the Winter War (1939-1940) Stalin's officers had to shoot some reluctant Russian soldiers in the back to force them to advance into Finnish territory. If Stalin had had his way, you would now be writing about Finns having given flowers to Stalin's troops and no doubt you would be convinced that Finland joined the Soviet Union voluntarily.
Stalin actually did set up a puppet government in Finland on 2 December 1939 and this "government," which was led by Otto Wille Kuusinen, requested "help" from the Soviet Union in pretty much the same way Stalin's puppet governments in the Baltic states asked for help or permission to join the Soviet Union. All the ministers were communists approved by Stalin although Radio Moscow lied to Muscovites that it was a multi-party government. Stalin was naive enough to believe that Finns would support Kuusinen's "government" thanks to the numerous improvements it promised for Finns. By late January he realised that supporting the "government" he had created was futile and it was officially disbanded on 12 March 1940.
Doubtless you have lots of documents that "prove" that the burdensome Winter War experience of Finland and Finns was actually beneficial for us and that Finns yearned to be ruled by Stalin in 1939 and have been hankering after dictatorial Russian rule ever since those days.
In an opinion poll conducted about two years ago in Finland, Finns were asked what kind of people they wouldn't like to have as their neighbours. Gypsies scored a few percent, drug addicts were quite high on the list of unfavourables and 23 percent said they wouldn't like a Russian for their neighbour. No other nationality was mentioned in the replies. "Truths" like those you represent help keep the popularity of Russia at a minimum in Finland and in the Baltic states, which lost their freedom for decades.
To guarantee a free press and society, the Baltic states have joined NATO. Presidents like George W. Bush have kept the popularity of joining NATO at 20 to 25 percent in Finland but as time goes by and Russian demonstrators become more frequent in Finland, we may reconsider the advantages and disadvantages of membership.
Incidentally, for all those who take an interest in the Soviet society and want to learn how things were done and how the bureaucracy worked, I recommend a thick book entitled The Russians. It was written by Hedrick Smith and first published in 1976. Smith worked for three years as The New York Times Bureau Chief in Moscow and, in his own words, "ranged as widely as time and the Soviet authorities would permit."
CB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISU_152
+
693170
Wed, 01 Apr 09 01:19 PM
Cool Breeze“No one is or was trying to count any votes.”
- thank you very much. I know , my english in bad, but do not know how bad .  But this way to improve is not worse than all another. CB - History is scientific discipline. As all sientistiс discipline he had methods of testify and analyse primary sourses - letters from arhives in this situation . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_source . All documents must be tested and allowed , or denied as fake . It`s hard work but he must be done if we want to found truth . You can not decline the facts , just because you dont liked they . You can imagine the physicist , as example , who may say - "Results of this experiment is bad for my teory and i do not use they" . it`s not physicist but cheater, isn`t it ? if "historicans" from new baltic lands don`t liked this work , and prefer to quoting ( without links ) the books like "Terrible сrimes of communism or six reason to join Waffen SS" under dr. Gebbels redaction - why he amazing if nobody in Russia want to belive him ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cool Breeze
+
693496
Thu, 02 Apr 09 08:39 AM
A Russian human rights activist and well-known critic of the Russian regime was beaten up in Moscow last Tuesday. The leader of For Human Rights organisation Lev Ponomarjov was attacked in front of his home by a group of men who took his cell phone. Ponomarjov had to go to hospital after the attack.
Ponomarjov has been vocal about the fact that young Russians haven't been given enough correct information on the Soviet Gulag. They have been fed myths about Dictator Josif Stalin instead. - Reuters
CB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ruslana
+
693696
Thu, 02 Apr 09 07:22 PM
CB, as soon as I heard that news, I was SURE you'd show up with it here. Funny it is how predictable people may be. Anyway, what I now want to say is that we have Finnish propaganda colliding with Russian propaganda here. Both are true at some points, and both are wrong at some points. But that was surely NOT the topic. Because, CB, what you are doing is posting only negative and only about Russia. OK you have your own reasons and no one has a right to blame you for that. But if this thread goes forward in this direction - it would be much better to start a new one titled "Slinging mud at Russia". By the way, that guy from The New York Times Bureau, - that was a very apt example of American propaganda which is neither better nor worse than the mentioned above.
Joined on
Sat, Dec 17 2005
Senior Member
3,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adrenochrome
+
711815
Sat, 02 May 09 08:38 PM
Ruslana
I'm afraid that you have overlooked the Cold War and the USAs anti-Communist stance. American society is raised with a very right wing view, in comparison with the rest of the world. I've even heard people describe Barrack Obama as a socialist/communist, yet in global terms he is a moderate right wing politician.
When you talk about 'freedom of speech', you fail to remember that criticising the US government is unpatriotic and anti-American, according to the Patriot Act. The rights of 'Habeas Corpus' and trial by twelve men and true did not apply to thousands of people held without any charge for years in Guantanemo Bay. Where was the freedom of speech during the McCarthy era?
The United States military has performed some of the worst atrocities since Hitler and Stalin, but avoid prosecution due to the veto on the UN Security Council. To the horror of many American troops, civilians were bombed and then gunned down in Korea. The American government never acknowledged any wrong doing ever by any of its troops - until footage came out from Abu Ghraid.
Do not misunderstand me - America has given the world plenty of good things, and most of iys people are friendly, decent human beings. It is far from the Utopia that it claims to be, however, and so is the United Kingdom, where I live. We should remember that we are all proud of our own nations, even with their flaws.
Russia is a very modern country, and is very different from the Stalin era and even from the days of the Soviet Union. Historically, this is also the nation that first put a man into space (and first put a woman into space - far more politically correct than the USA!), the country of Peter the Great, Tchaikovsky, Mussorgsky and Shostakovich, the country that was wise enough to name a whole Muscovite street after the English town of Rochdale (where I was born, just like Anna 'Pushing Up Daisies' Friel), the land of Tolstoy, Dostoievsky and Chekov (not the one from Star Trek), the country that gave us the second most entertaining politician of the last 30 years, Boris Yeltsin (second, only to your own Dubya). If it hadn't been for Eisenstein, American film directors would not have been rolling prams down stairs in a cliched attempt at drama for the last 50 years.
Putin is probably not a very nice man, but I wouldn't want Gordon Brown or Tony Blair in my house either.
To summarise, I wouldn't believe everything that the American media tells you about Russia, and you should visit the country and see what it's like, so you can form your own genuine perspective - it is a beautiful country, not perfect but far from the country that the Western media portrays it to be.
As for 'political correctness' - it is veiled bigotry. It is used by bigots to try and cover up their inherent hatred. As we all know, it is far more revealing of a person that which goes unsaid, not their spoken words, and that their actions speak louder than their words.
Joined on
Wed, Apr 8 2009
Full Member
138
|
|
|
|
|
|