We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Fri, Oct 7 2005 4:13 AM by Clive. 1 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Teo  +  145362 Fri, 07 Oct 05 03:46 AM

Bush reasserts his faith in Supreme Court choice Harriet Miers.  He says, "She'll have been a judge, but nevertheless the philosophy won't change, and that's important to me."

We can use the future perfect to say that something will have been done, completed or achieved by a certain time in the future. We can also use will have ... to 'predict the present' - to say what we think or guess has probably happened.

But why does Bush use the future perfect in his statement? 

Thank you very much for your reply.

Teo
Joined on Tue, Sep 28 2004
Taiwan
Contributing Member 1,631
Thank you very much for your reply.
Clive  +  145372 Fri, 07 Oct 05 04:13 AM

Hi,

I think he is referring to the time after she becomes a judge, and saying that in that tome her opinions won't change. I think he should have used the verb 'become'. It's typical Bush-speak, don't sweat over it!

Clive

Joined on Thu, Oct 28 2004
Canada
Veteran Member 29,629
El tango argentino es un pensamiento triste que se puede bailar (The tango argentino is a sad thought which can be danced) Enrique Santos Discépolo
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3614.32638. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.