A point of view:
Georgia's Attack on South Ossetia: Washington's Role
Georgia's defense budget has grown from USD 20 million in 2001 to USD 734 million in 2007 and over USD 900 million in 2008. Accounting for inflation, this is roughly a 40-fold increase in military spending in just six years. So when Irakli Alasania, Georgia's UN Ambassador, tells the UN Security Council that his country is “a small and peace-loving nation”, the logical question should be: what does a peace-loving nation need with so many new howitzers, mortars, armored personnel carriers, tanks, missile boats, and helicopter gunships?
Where does Saakashvili get the cash to rearm his army?
On August 10 Russian news agency RIA Novosti quoted South Ossetian official representative in Moscow Dmitry Medoev saying that there were several Negroes among the Georgian troops killed during the fighting in Tskhinvali...
Over the past few years, hundreds of US military instructors were sent to Georgia to train Saakashvili's army. Several senior Pentagon officers were permanently stationed in Tbilisi to coordinate these training activities.
The Americans had to have known that Georgian artillery was preparing to slaughter hundreds of civilians in Tskhinvali. They had to have known about the large-scale movements of Georgian troops and heavy weapons.
...
After this, what do you personally feel watching how Bush, Rice, Obama, McCain and their media (CNN, FoxNews...) blame the "bad Russia" for beating the "good Georgia"?