[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


1 2 3
Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Mon, Oct 27 2008 2:32 PM by Anonymous. 25 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Swagatalakshmi  +  263053 Tue, 05 Sep 06 07:13 PM
Consider the follwoing sentences :

Five fledging sea eagles left their nests in western Scotland this summer, bringing to 34 the number of wild birds successfully raised since transplants from Norway began in 1975.


"On Thursday August 31st the UN’s Security Council passed a resolution
authorising 17,300 peacekeepers and a few thousand civilian police to be deployed in Darfur"

Are these underlined words participles ? if yes, what are these modifying ?

Are these gerunds ? if yes, what function these are performing  (example : adverbial clause, object, object complements etc) ?




Joined on Tue, Sep 5 2006
New Member 05
Aperisic  +  263063 Tue, 05 Sep 06 07:53 PM

1. Five fledging sea eagles left their nests in western Scotland this summer, so they brought to 34 the number of wild birds successfully raised since transplants from Norway began in 1975.

2. "On Thursday August 31st the UN’s Security Council passed a resolution that authorizes 17,300 peacekeepers and a few thousand civilian police to be deployed in Darfur"

or

3. "On Thursday August 31st the UN’s Security Council passed a resolution by which they authorized 17,300 peacekeepers and a few thousand civilian police to be deployed in Darfur"

Function: Present participle for a separate clause with the same subject (or in the case 2. object adverbial sentence)

Gerund is a noun (Dancing is fun).

Joined on Fri, Jul 21 2006
Full Member 409
Swagatalakshmi  +  263069 Tue, 05 Sep 06 08:14 PM
I'm sorry but I still didn't get it.
Can you explain the relationship between "Five fledging sea eagles left their nests in western Scotland this summer" and "bringing to 34 the number of wild birds successfully raised since transplants from Norway began in 1975."
The partciple "bringing" modifies which noun ?


Aperisic  +  263083 Tue, 05 Sep 06 08:34 PM

 Swagatalakshmi wrote:
I'm sorry but I still didn't get it.
Can you explain the relationship between "Five fledging sea eagles left their nests in western Scotland this summer" and "bringing to 34 the number of wild birds successfully raised since transplants from Norway began in 1975."
The partciple "bringing" modifies which noun ?

It does not modify anything it is replacing the beginning of another sentence that has the same subject and is describing the action that is happening at the same time or is a consequence of the action previously mentioned

  • I was running 20 km that day so I reached almost 100 km that week.
  • I was running 20 km that day reaching almost 100 km that week.
  • He won 5 games thus he won the gold medal.
  • He won 5 games winning the gold medal.
CalifJim  +  263097 Tue, 05 Sep 06 09:15 PM
1.  bringing is a participle.  It modifies the whole sentence which precedes.  Or, if you will, it modifies the implied leaving (of the eagles)The leaving of the eagles brought to 34 the number of ...  It's adverbial in nature, so technically it should not be called a participle according to some grammarians.  However, the only term that I know of that applies when an -ing word is not used as either adjective (participle) or noun (gerund), but as an adverb, is adverbial participle.
2.  authorising is a participle.  It modifies resolution.  It's adjectival in nature.

CJ

Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member 22,447
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
Maple  +  263112 Tue, 05 Sep 06 09:35 PM

Hi,

Finally the "adverbial participle" was mentioned in this forum.

The "participle" phrase functions as an adverb is often said by teachers in China, and I'd been wondering why those grammar knowledge links provided by IK don't include that.

Smile [:)]Star [star]
Joined on Tue, Jul 11 2006
An ESL student in China
Contributing Member 1,110
Cool Breeze  +  263120 Tue, 05 Sep 06 10:33 PM
Five fledging sea eagles left their nests in western Scotland this summer, bringing to 34 the number of wild birds successfully raised since transplants from Norway began in 1975.

"On Thursday August 31st the UN’s Security Council passed a resolution
authorising 17,300 peacekeepers and a few thousand civilian police to be deployed in Darfur"

Both are present participles used as relative clause equivalents:

Five fledging sea eagles left their nests in western Scotland this summer, which brought to 34 the number of wild birds successfully raised since transplants from Norway began in 1975.

"On Thursday August 31st the UN’s Security Council passed a resolution
which/that authorised 17,300 peacekeepers and a few thousand civilian police to be deployed in Darfur"

In the first sentence the antecedent is the entire main clause and in the second the antecedent is a resolution.

Cheers
CB
Joined on Fri, Apr 7 2006
Senior Member 3,979
"I hope you'll all live to be 150 years old - and the last voice you hear is mine!" Frank Sinatra on stage in Oslo, Norway, 28 September 1991
Aperisic  +  263310 Wed, 06 Sep 06 11:53 AM

I strongly underline as well that participle does not modify anything here. The participle is just a shorthand notation for another sentence, thus it adds more information that is related to previous sentence, but it does not modify it. The function of participle does not have to be to modify anything.

In the next example

Swimming through the mud, we had to continue our journey.

The participle, swimming, could be said to have adverbial function (adverbial participle), because it says how we continued our journey: by swimming. However

I jumped into the empty pool and I hit my head very hard.

I jumped into the empty pool hitting my head very hard.

jump and hit are two separate actions certainly connected but they do not modify each other I any sense.

Swagatalakshmi  +  263432 Wed, 06 Sep 06 06:30 PM

Aperisic -I respectfully disagree with you.



"Swimming through the mud, we had to continue our journey."
Swiming though the mud is definitely a participle which modifies we. Similar examples :

Exhausted from the hike, Jim dropped to the ground.
Shouting angrily, the man chased the thief.
Trying to open the gate, I tore my coat.



1 2 3
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.