He is gone. What tense is being used? Is that simple present tense?

1 2
   Share on Facebook  
Cinderellaaa  #321476  Mon, 29 Jan 07 03:04 PM
its simple present and gone is adjective
  
Not Ranked
Joined on Mon, Jan 29 2007
Egypt
New Member (02)
Cinderellaaa
Jackson6612  #351102  Sun, 15 Apr 07 01:29 PM

Goodman wrote:

Yes, you may say that. However, [he is gone] is more of an idiomatic expression than grammatical in my opinion which merely means one of the followings;

1-“He is no loner here”.

2-“He has passed on, meaning dead”

3-“He doesn’t exist in my life”

If you examine the grammatical structure of [he is gone], it’s equivalent to “I am tired”, “he is interested” and “she is depressed”. All the highlighted words are past participles used as adjectives because of the state of being made to feel a certain emotion or an action is being acted upon.

I am so glad Paul is gone. Working with him was such misery.- In this context, it fit the  meaning of # 1 in the above.

[Gone] is an adjective here, whether he was made to leave, fired or voluntarily resigned, [Gone] signifies his absence.

Questions:

1: In ''[he is gone] is more of an idiomatic expression'', I think here idiomatic means that he is gone is very common expression to English speakers. Right?

2: Please explain the following sentence and shouldn't and are be used in front of used?

All the highlighted words are past participles (and are) used as adjectives because of the state of being made to feel a certain emotion or an action is being acted upon.

CalifJim wrote:

Absolutely not!  to go is an intransitive verb.  Such verbs have no passive forms.  Only transitive verbs can be placed in passive voice.

gone is a past participle used as an adjective.  The sentence as a whole is in present tense.

Centuries ago, the present perfect tense of to go used to be formed with the auxiliary to be instead of the auxiliary to have.  Thus, centuries ago, is gone was the present perfect tense of to go

In modern English, is gone is a present tense form of to be with the adjectival past participle gone, and the present perfect is has/have gone.

Questions:

1: In the following sentence shouldn't and is be used in front of used?

Gone is a past participle (and is) used as an adjective.

2: Shouldn't was be used in front of used in the following sentence?

Centuries ago, the present perfect tense of to go (was) used to be formed...

  
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Dec 27 2006
Senior Member (3,187)
Trusted Users
NOTE: When you reply to my post, please look for mistakes in grammar, syntax or punctuation, and let me know of any suggestions you have. Thank you.
Grammar Geek  #351121  Sun, 15 Apr 07 03:10 PM

Jackson, rather than attempting to answer your questions one by one...

A steak knife is a utensil used to cut meat.
A steak knife is a utensil that is used to cut meat.
A steak knife is a utensil and it is used to cut meat.
A steak knife if a utensil and is used to cut meat.

All of these are correct. The first one is the type used most often by native speakers, I would say. If you do not yet have the feel for this type of usage, it is okay to use any of the others. But be assured, the first is correct as well. That seems to be the point behind many of your questions.

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Tue, Jan 10 2006
Pennsylvania, USA
Veteran Member (16,067)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
Barbara, who answers in American English.
Anonymous  #511226  Thu, 08 May 08 02:08 PM
I think it's a big mistake because the verb after the auxiliary is in the past participle, it means that the auxiliary should be 'has'  (the verb 'to have' in the present) instead of 'is' (the verb 'to be'  in the present. its a common mistake and it's a confusion of the contracted form of this sentence (He's gone) witch is He has gone, the ('s) after the pronoun (He) is taken as the contrected from of (is).
  
1 2
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service