Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Tue, Feb 24 2009 6:14 AM by Mister Micawber. 1 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
jossx  +  678548 Sun, 22 Feb 09 05:37 PM
Can you check if these grammar constructions are good?

1) Noisy as a pack of dogs, my neighbours move off to Valparaiso at night.

2) The children got out the school happy about the end of the season.
    I don't remember if a comma is required. Do you know it?. This is and adjectival phrase (I think)

3) Charles, rich as a businessman and glamorous as an actor, couldn't catch his beloved's attention.
    Is the appositive correct?

4) We got in the stadium ignoring the check-points.
    Ignoring explains an action happening at the same time. is it the ing- clause good?
    It suggests that they could've paid for the ticket but ignored the check points.

5) We got in the stadium by ignoring the check points.
   The method they used to enter the stadium was ignoring the check points. (is the prep. phrase ok?)
    if you write a comma before "ignoring" it still carries the same meaning as with "by"

6) With a pair of earplugs and a mp3 player, a person could get deaf in six months.
   I know one can change the Prep.Phrase order depending on the emphasis you're giving to the sentence. :D
   but is this correct?

7) Maria made very bad decisions afraid of what was gonna happen.
   Could you explain these constructions?. I'm not sure if they're correct.

Ufff, I hard a really hard time studying this. Hope it's fine. DON'T doubt to correct me if i'm wrong.

Thanks in advance!

au revoir



Joined on Tue, Jan 6 2009
New Member 38
"The only thing that I know is that I know nothing"
Mister Micawber  +  679450 Tue, 24 Feb 09 06:14 AM
.
1) Noisy as a pack of dogs, my neighbours moved off to Valparaiso at night. (I doubt that they move every night.)

2) The children got out of school, happy about the end of the year/term.

3) Charles, rich as a tycoon and handsome as an actor, couldn't draw the girl's attention.
(Businessmen are not proverbially rich.  Girls are glamorous.  If it were his beloved, attention would not be a problem.)

4) Ignoring the check-points, we got into the stadium.

5) We got in the stadium by ignoring the check points.
if you write a comma before "ignoring" it still carries the same meaning as with "by"-- No, in #4 the getting in does not necessarily require the ignoring.

6) With a pair of earplugs and an mp3 player, a person could go deaf in six months.

7) Maria made very bad decisions, afraid of what was going to happen. -- 'Gonna ' is not a written word; it should not appear outside of quoted speech.

The structures are OK.  If the phrase is fronted, it should always be followed by a comma.  If it comes afterward, don't use a comma only if the adverb is very restrictive of its referent.
.
Joined on Wed, Aug 4 2004
Yokohama
Veteran Member 30,501
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master-- that's all.'
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3598.39794. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.