(1) I want to begin by saluting Professor Ravi Sharma for having brought this important conference into being. Of all the people I think of Ravi as the man who gets things done.
Should it be "is the man"? Please insert commas where necessary.
(2) But as the story has it I'm not sure this is quite right(if it pertains to) Galileo, (but)---it used to be thought the larger objects fell faster than smaller objects.
Should "that" be inserted before "the larger objects"
(3) Now, this new way of knowing proofwhich retired false hypotheses and put in place their alternative ones that were confirmedand went on into laboratory experiment.
Are there too many emdashes? Please clarify.
(4) Let's just think about this subject that has brought us together. Religio is Latin for rebinding. And religion involves belonging and, when that belonging has been sundered, then work toward rebinding it.
Does the last sentence "And religion...rebinding it" has clarity in mening? Please rephrase.
(5) But let me remind you, the only submission by true people, a scientist and religionists, were the only one they wouldn't touch.
"were the only one " s-v agreement please check
(6) September 11 proved that the most advanced parts of the current civilization is prone to harm from its most marginalized parts and the source of this vulnerability should be found in different layers of politics, culture, and economy.
Should it be "are prone"
(7) Could you speak a little more as a blogger yourself about the role of weblogs and the new generation.
can question mark inserted instead of period
(8) I repeat what I said in my talk that so many religious conflicts in the world are just called religious. In fact, they are more political issues and they have their roots in politics.
"they are more political..." Does it make sense?