Hi,
I meant I'm tempted to scrap all of my criticism - just delete it.
The river metaphor is great. I love it. I got tied up in what I felt were some conflicts in the details, and I didn't have the mental stamina to work my way through it. There's nothing wrong with your image or your conception of it. I understood exactly what you meant from the beginning.
You have the tributaries right. They "contribute" to the river. The river flows downhill by gravity. It usually originates high in the mountains as small trickles from melting snow. These join together to form small streams, which join into larger streams, streams to brooks, brooks to larger brooks, then to small rivers, then larger rivers. This is the tributary system. It all eventually ends up in the ocean. The brook by my old house in New Hampshire flowed into a bigger brook, which flowed into the Sugar River, which is a tributary of the Conneticut River, which flows to the Atlantic Ocean. The Missouri River in central US is a tributary of the Mississippi river, which flows into the Gulf of Mexico.
If you were a salmon, swimming upstream against the current, you'd have to make many choices. Shall I go left or right? From the salmon's point of view, the stream appears to diverge. If she survives her journey and lays her eggs, she then returns to the ocean. What a trip - all downhill - no choices to make - just go with the flow - watch out for the bears! Now all the streams appear to converge.
Your new sentences are great. Maybe too many
-ing's. You could say "hunger for broader and deeper (too many
-er's?) understanding keeps [seeking] and [exploring] new tributaries etc." That way the tributaries or the information is already out there and she seeks it out, rather than "creating" it. Information then becomes knowledge. Your choice, of course.
Best wishes, - A.
Edit. As a lifelong Frost fan, the "Two roads diverged" sprang into my mind. After I wrote it in my previous post and decided to check usages, I found that my dictionary used him also. I was shocked that I had never seemed to realize that it was "Two roads diverged," although I've long known it from memory. I had always conceived it as
one road dividing into two, which it of course has to be. After all, when we say, "two roads converged" we mean
into one. Whether they converge or diverge depends on which way you're travelling. I think I sometimes confuse the joining and splitting with the idea of progressively growing closer together, or father apart.