Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

Has/have

Easy Basic English ONLY » Basic English Grammar Questions

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Wed, Aug 29 2007 3:45 PM by Mister Micawber. 3 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Anonymous  +  411083 Wed, 29 Aug 07 02:11 PM
Am I am correct in saying that the highlighted HAS(S) should be replaced by have?

Thanks

'I think the cruel vilification and character assassination of ZIggy by BB and its spin-off programmes HAS gone far enough and HAS overstepped the bounds of human decency and dignity'
Anonymous
This is a live chat room, hosted on the chat page. You can also click here to see the chat in fullscreen.
Mister Micawber  +  411124 Wed, 29 Aug 07 03:22 PM

Not really, though it is possible.  The writer obviously thinks that 'vilification and assassination' are parts of the same single act, and I tend to agree.
Mister Micawber
Joined on Wed, Aug 4 2004
Yokohama
Veteran Member 30,501
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master-- that's all.'
Related discussions
Anonymous, 2 yr 71 days ago
Formally, it should be have.
Mister Micawber  +  411147 Wed, 29 Aug 07 03:45 PM

No, you are wrong, Anonymous.
Mister Micawber
Welcome to Englishforums.com, the world's largest EFL / TEFL social network.

Places to start

Browse Englishforums

© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3598.39794. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.