have come vs have came?

I've seen:

1) You should have come to the party.

but not:

2) You should have came to the party.



but when you replace come with something else, it's in past tense.


1) You should have went to the party.
2) You should have shot the target.




Which is correct for the first set and why is that?

Loojka wrote:

It's should have + past participle 1) You should have come to the party. - OK 2) You should have came to the party. - not OK 1) You should have went to the party. - wrong  ("gone" instead of "went") 2) You should have shot the target. - OK (but the past simple and the past participle of this verb are the same)

'Came' is the simple past tense and should never be used with the auxiliary 'have'.  'Come', even though it looks like the present, is the past participle to be used in the compound tenses.