We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Tue, Apr 29 2008 1:53 PM by Mister Micawber. 1 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Scw72  +  507050 Tue, 29 Apr 08 01:02 PM

Hi all,

Is it possible that the negative form of "have to' would be "haven't to" or " have not to" instead of "don't have to" ? 

Thanks for your help in advance!!

cw

Joined on Mon, Apr 16 2007
New Member 41
Mister Micawber  +  507082 Tue, 29 Apr 08 01:53 PM
.
Yes, that is possible, but I think that only the contraction is accepted.
Joined on Wed, Aug 4 2004
Yokohama
Veteran Member 30,788
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master-- that's all.'
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.