We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Sat, Jul 29 2006 6:21 AM by Inchoateknowledge. 4 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Inchoateknowledge  +  249453 Thu, 27 Jul 06 02:10 PM
1. Oddly enough, he went home early.
2. Despite there not being many people at the party, we insisted on staying.

I try to find all the heads in the two sentences.
(Heads will roll.)

1. Let me think,  it is phrases that have heads, is it not?
How many phrases are there in the first sentence?
2?
Or productum 6? (there are 6 words in the sentence)
'Oddly enough' is phrase. The head is 'odd', not oddly, because the head is to be a morpheme.
'he went home early' is a phrase.What is the head here?  Went.  Why?  Because went, the morpheme of which is went (the same), determines the syntactic function of the phrase.
'enough, he went' Is it a phrase? I think so. what about this one? I do not think it has syntactical function. So it is futile to speak about the head of it.

Comments?

2. Despite there not being many people at the party, we insisted on staying.

Despite is a conjunctive adverbial, is it? It links two main clauses? Yes, I think.
First clause: 'Despite there not being many people at the party' What is the head?
be? Yes, because being determines the syntactic function of the phrase: noun, and it is a gerund phrase.
The head is 'be' because the lexeme 'being' has the morpheme 'be'. 'Was' is a morpheme too, is it not?
Does it mean 'was' is a head too in the phrase? No, I do not think so, because the tense should be the same.

Comments?







Joined on Wed, May 3 2006
Senior Member 2,549
Beep! Beep! :)
nona the brit  +  250033 Sat, 29 Jul 06 01:21 AM
I don't understand what you mean by 'heads'? Or productum for that matter (the Latin word for 'something produced)?
Joined on Wed, Sep 22 2004
England
Veteran Member 11,713
The name says it all.
CalifJim  +  250066 Sat, 29 Jul 06 02:49 AM
In transformational grammar, there are noun phrases (NPs), adjective phrases (APs), verb phrases (VPs), adverb phrases (ADVPs), and prepositional phrases (PPs).  In each, the main noun, adjective, verb, adverb, or preposition is called the head.  The main noun of an NP is the head of the NP, and so on.  In this system of analysis even a single word can be considered a phrase.  Phrases are often embedded in other phrases.

he = NP.  Head = he
went home early = VP.  Head = went
home = ADVP  Head = home
early = ADVP.  Head = early
oddly enough = ADVP  Head = oddly  ('enough' can be considered a modifier)
______

despite, like although,  is subordinating.  You don't have two main clauses here.

Your examples are more complicated than the usual illustrations in the transformational grammar books I am familiar with.  Here's about as much as I can handle in the second sentence.

many people at the party = NP.  Head = people
many people = NP  Head = people
at the party = PP  Head = at
the party = NP  Head = party

CJ

Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member 22,405
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
Inchoateknowledge  +  250096 Sat, 29 Jul 06 06:20 AM
Thank you Nona; Jim has already managed to figure it out.
Productum is a matematical operator, denoted by  π

productum 6 means:  π 6 = 1+2+3+...+6
Inchoateknowledge, 3 yr 118 days ago
Crystal clear now.
Thanks Jim.

© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3614.32638. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.