We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!
Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com
This question is Not Answered
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
+
5165
Thu, 21 Aug 03 02:48 PM
how many tenses are there in english?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pemmican
+
5184
Thu, 21 Aug 03 08:10 PM
As far as I know, there are these 13 tenses:
a) Past Perfect Progressive ........................had been + present participle
b) Past Perfect ..........................................had + past participle
c) Past Progressive ...................................was/were + present participle
d) Simple Past ..........................................past tense form
e) Present Perfect Progressive ...................have/has been + present participle
f) Present Perfect .....................................have/has + past participle
g)Present Progressive .................................am/is/are + present participle
h)Simple Present ........................................present tense form = almost same form as infinitive (except "to be"); when used with he/she/it: +(e)s (except modal helping verbs)
i)will-Future ...............................................will + infinitive
j)will-Future Progressive .............................will be + present participle
k)will-Future Perfect ...................................will have + past participle
l)will-Future Perfect Progressive ..................will have been + present participle
m)Going-to-Future ......................................am/is/are going to + infinitive
Sometimes, the Conditionals are also said to be tenses, but those are just modi of an actual tense, no tenses themselves.
Joined on
Thu, Aug 21 2003
Regular Member
569
Wâ mag ich mich nu vinden? wâ mac ich mich nu suochen, wâ? nu bin ich hie und bin ouch dâ und enbin doch weder dâ noch hie. wer wart ouch sus verirret ie? wer wart ie sus...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
moijelesuis
+
5192
Thu, 21 Aug 03 09:33 PM
good answer pemmican regarding the conditionals... the same can be said for the all but (sadly) extinct subjunctive in english (which is present tense, except for "were", the past subjunctive of "to be")
Joined on
Sat, Aug 16 2003
usa/canada
Full Member
116
|
|
|
|
|

Anonymous,
4 yr 125 days ago
Pemmican wrote: | As far as I know, there are these 13 tenses:
a) Past Perfect Progressive ........................had been + present participle b) Past Perfect ..........................................had + past participle c) Past Progressive ...................................was/were + present participle d) Simple Past ..........................................past tense form
e) Present Perfect Progressive ...................have/has been + present participle f) Present Perfect .....................................have/has + past participle
g)Present Progressive .................................am/is/are + present participle h)Simple Present ........................................present tense form = almost same form as infinitive (except "to be"); when used with he/she/it: +(e)s (except modal helping verbs)
i)will-Future ...............................................will + infinitive j)will-Future Progressive .............................will be + present participle k)will-Future Perfect ...................................will have + past participle l)will-Future Perfect Progressive ..................will have been + present participle
m)Going-to-Future ......................................am/is/are going to + infinitive
Sometimes, the Conditionals are also said to be tenses, but those are just modi of an actual tense, no tenses themselves. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
paco2004
+
115995
Wed, 06 Jul 05 10:13 PM
The number of English tenses depends on how one defines "tense".
If one defines it as morphemes of verbs, English has only two tenses: past and present.
paco
Joined on
Wed, Nov 17 2004
Senior Member
4,095
In Japan today even dogs are learning how to bow-wow in English.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
viognier
+
116063
Thu, 07 Jul 05 03:01 AM
Hi Pemmican ;-)
You could add:
m') Going-to-Future in the past ....................... was/were going to + infinitive
m) Going-to-Future ...................................... am/is/are going to + infinitive
m'') Going-to-Future in the future .................... will be going to + infinitive
We may add:
n)Habituality in the past ...............................used to + infinitive
Hi paco :)
I agree with your first sentence.
As to second one, I respectfully and faithfully disagree with you.
Dealing with some grammatical category of verb, we not necessarily have to confine "morphological (=grammaticalized) forms in "inflectional" one, I think.
And my argument is based on "Cours de morphologie générale." Vol.1, by Igor Mel'cuk (1993). (Translated from Russian. It's the best morphological theory ever, I think!)
See you later and have a good day.
Joined on
Tue, Jul 5 2005
Junior Member
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eimai_Anglos
+
116374
Fri, 08 Jul 05 02:10 AM
QUOTE: we not necessarily have to...
We do not necessarily have to...
(No idea why, but that's how we would say it!)
Joined on
Thu, Jun 23 2005
Regular Member
509
Martin - native English speaker and technical author.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
viognier
+
116411
Fri, 08 Jul 05 05:12 AM
Thank you Very Much, Eimai_Anglos. Writing this sentence, I wasn't sure at all about its correctness :), so I'm really glad to get your kind help!
Very cheery day or evening to you ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
paco2004
+
116476
Fri, 08 Jul 05 08:40 AM
Hello Viognier
viognier wrote: | | Dealing with some grammatical category of verb, we not necessarily have to confine "morphological (=grammaticalized) forms in "inflectional" one, I think. |
|
I'm sorry but I couldn't get well what you are saying. Could you explain it in a more detailed way?
paco
|
|
|
|
|
|