Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Wed, Sep 29 2004 4:59 AM by Guest. 3 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Guest  +  47913 Wed, 29 Sep 04 04:59 AM
About the revival of languages. On my options, it can occur in two ways.
First, linguists can study moribund languages and seek to preserve the components of the language:the sounds, the vocabulary, the grammer, and the traditions.
The second way is to teach children the language and have linguists advise on language maintenance.
I also want to know your thought. Let's talk over!!
matthewg  +  48032 Wed, 29 Sep 04 03:47 PM
Hi,

I encourage you to register.

The correct way to spell the word is grammar.

There are two types of grammar teachers: prescriptive and descriptive. The grammar books you're used to are what linguists call prescriptive, in the way they prescribe rules for proper usage. For several hundred years, "grammar" was synonymous with "prescriptive grammar." You went to a book to get the official word: thou shalt not split infinitives, thou shalt not end sentences with prepositions. (This is presumably why you're reading this guide now: to find out what's "right" and what's "wrong.")
Linguists today are justly dubious about such things, and most spend their time on descriptive grammars: descriptions of how people really speak and write, instead of rules on how they should.

Prescriptive versus Descriptive Grammars
Joined on Mon, Sep 6 2004
Full Member 395
nona the brit  +  48238 Thu, 30 Sep 04 12:29 PM
Different countries have different attitudes towards the preservation of their languages. My personal preference is for a descriptive rather than prescriptive system.

In France, however, I understand that they have a prescriptive attitude, with tight controls over how the language is used and an official block on 'foreign' words being brought in to the language. I've even heard that there is a list of official baby names they have to stick to. This seems quite ridiculous and over-controlling.

I'm not sure if the original question was about reviving/preserving dying languages though. this is a diffeent idea altogether. In Britain, although English is spoken throughout, you mustn't forget that there are other countries here apart from England. Wales has its own language (Welsh) and Scotland has a couple of very distinct dialects and I believe its own language. Even Cornwall, which is a county of England but historically a separate kingdom, has its own language. These languages were officially discouraged until quite recently, to the great resentment of speakers, but now at last they are recognised and numbers of speakers are increasing again.

Language is so often tied into people's sense of identity.
Joined on Wed, Sep 22 2004
England
Veteran Member 11,743
The name says it all.
matthewg  +  48284 Thu, 30 Sep 04 02:34 PM
In France, the Academie Francaise controls the prescription of the French language, with its board meeting, if I'm not mistaken, every Thursday to formulate new rules and words.
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3598.39794. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.