How to report a discovery

   Share on Facebook  
MarvinTheMartian  #504523  Wed, 23 Apr 08 11:26 PM

Hi, once again, I'm having trouble to accurately put my thoughts into words. Some time ago, I was reading a scientific article about the possibility of life on Titan, a moon orbiting Saturn. When I tried to summarize what I had just read, the first sentence that came to my mind was "Scientists believe they may have found another celestial body that might be capable of sustaining life." However, this sentence is problematic as it suggests that the scientists in question weren't aware of the planetoid's existence prior to hypothesizing that it might harbor life.

I considered an alternate way of saying it ("Scientists believe they may have discovered that there might be life on another celestial body"), but thought it was too vague (i.e. it could be referring to any celestial body) in addition to being awkward-sounding.

Finally, I thought of the following sentence: "Scientists believe they may have found evidence of possible life on another celestial body." However, I have a problem with the word "evidence" as it makes it sound like an irrefutable discovery. In addition, I can't help but think there must be a simpler way of putting it (preferably, without having to specify the name the celestial body in question.) Any suggestions?

Also, I would appreciate if you could point out ANY mistakes or inaccuracies you find in this message. Any mistake -- even the slightest! Precision of speech is sacrosanct to me. Thank you.

  
Top 500 Contributor
Joined on Fri, Jan 18 2008
Junior Member (86)
Feebs11  #504526  Wed, 23 Apr 08 11:37 PM
 According to recent reports, scientists think they may have evidence of a celestial body that supports possible life-forms.
  
Top 25 Contributor
Joined on Thu, Nov 23 2006
UK
Senior Member (4,638)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
RayH  #504527  Wed, 23 Apr 08 11:41 PM

MarvinTheMartian
I'm having trouble to accurately put my thoughts into words.

Well, since you ask for correction of any mistake. Say, "I'm having trouble to accurately putting my thoughts into words."

As for your trouble with the substance of your question, I would go with the last one. In a context like this "evidence" isn't taken to mean "irrefutable proof". In fact, I'm not sure "evidence" is ever taken to mean "irrefutable proof".
  
Top 150 Contributor
Joined on Sat, Mar 22 2008
CA, USA
Regular Member (542)
Native speaker of U. S. English.Not a grammar expert.
Goodman  #504530  Wed, 23 Apr 08 11:48 PM
<<>> "Scientists believe they may have found another celestial body that might be capable of sustaining life."
<<>>>"Scientists believe they may have found evidence of possible life on another celestial body."
I see no problem with the above statements.  A lot of reported findings in the scientific community is based on environmental analysis and educated observations as well as calculations.
  
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Nov 7 2005
Calif. USA
Senior Member (2,958)
The name says it all!
MarvinTheMartian  #504538  Thu, 24 Apr 08 12:29 AM

Thanks, Ray. I have this regrettable habit of splitting infinitives. Do you detect any more mistakes / incorrect sentence structures on my part?

Thanks to everybody else on this thread. Is there really no other way of wording this? I understand that the word "evidence" is appropriate in my example, but surely there must be an easier way of saying it. After all, it only occurred to me to use the word "evidence" after I failed to construct the sentence in any other way.

  
RayH  #504544  Thu, 24 Apr 08 01:00 AM
The fact is, any of your suggestions are fine; however, in the interest of your peace of mind I've modified your originals:
"Scientists believe they may have found another celestial body that might be capable of sustaining life."
"Scientists believe they may have discovered that there might be life on another celestial body"
"Scientists believe they may have found evidence of possible life on another celestial body."

but thought it was too vague (i.e. it could be referring to any celestial body)
If you don't want to name the body in question it seems this criticism could apply to anything you say.

A few suggestions of my own for your consideration:
"Scientists have discovered what they believe to be evidence of life on another celestial body."
"Scientists have discovered evidence that they believe points to the possibility of life on another celestial body."
  
MarvinTheMartian  #504561  Thu, 24 Apr 08 02:18 AM

Your modifications make my statements sound too conclusive (in my opinion.) Is it ungrammatical to use so many auxiliaries in the same sentence? Did you feel my original sentences sounded awkward?

Your last suggestion sounds acceptable to me. (i.e. "Scientists have discovered evidence that they believe points to the possibility of life on another celestial body.") In fact, it's PERFECT! Nodding However, I'm still trying to find a shorter, more casual (and yet accurate) way of wording it... (Read the second part of my previous post.)

Well, thank you in advance. Your help is much appreciated.

  
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions