[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Thu, Oct 15 2009 7:05 PM by Anonymous. 0 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Anonymous  +  943392 Thu, 15 Oct 09 07:05 PM
I proofread court depositions.  Attorneys and deponents frequently make up their own series of words to explain things.  Court reporting school teaches certain things for punctuation, yet I can't find the rule to verify it.  My first example is correct:  sixteenth-century-type dress, meaning to dress in the style of what they wore in the sixteenth century.  This second example is where I have difficulty:  sixteenth century type of dress  OR  sixteenth-century type of dress?  Logic would dictate that sixteeth-century modifies "type," but court reporting schools teach that when "of" follows, there is no hyphen.  Where is a rule to support this one way or the other.  I'm baffled.

 

Sue

© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3615.39139. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.