I believe they should

1 2
   Share on Facebook  
New2grammar  #514072  Thu, 15 May 08 04:39 PM

1. I believe they/he/she will
2. I believe they/he/she can
3. I believe they/he/she should

Of the three contructions, I have trouble understanding the last one.
To me, there's some contradiction between believe and should. Should describes your opinion toward something and expresses your belief- more precisely your thought.
To me, having both just sounds weird. Can someone convince me otherwise?
Thanks!

  
Top 25 Contributor
Joined on Tue, Nov 21 2006
Forum Guru (5,630)
Avangi  #514075  Thu, 15 May 08 04:42 PM

How about, "In my opinion she is obligated / obliged to"  I believe she should pay for the damage.

  
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Nov 19 2007
Advanced Member (2,207)
Trusted Users
". . . le plaisir delicieux et toujours nouveau d'une occupation inutile." - Henri de Regnier
New2grammar  #514081  Thu, 15 May 08 04:58 PM

Your reply helped me see it from a different perspective. I think I understand it better now.Thanks Avangi.

  
CalifJim  #514082  Thu, 15 May 08 04:59 PM
New2grammar
To me, having both just sounds weird. Can someone convince me otherwise?
Think of the difference in meaning if you leave out 'should':

I believe that she is leaving.  (It seems to me that she is about to leave.  I see her making preparations to leave.  I conclude that she is leaving.)

I believe that she left.  (It seems to me that she went out the door.  I look around, and I don't see her anymore.  She has gone, as far as I can tell.)

I believe she should leave.  (There was an emergency call.  Someone in her family is hurt.  The best thing for her to do now, in my opinion, is for her to leave -- to go to them and help and comfort them.  It seems to me advisable for her to leave.  --   Alternately:  She is drunk.  She is embarrassing herself and others.  She needs to go home and sleep it off.  It seems to me advisable that she leave.)

I believe is the it-seems-to-me element; should is the it-is-advisable element.  The it-is-advisable element is missing from the first two sentences.

CJ 

 

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Forum Guru (15,629)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
Avangi  #514086  Thu, 15 May 08 05:07 PM

Hi,

I'd say after reading CJ's post that my example is too narrow, seeming limited to a moral obligation.  His use of "advisable" is more appropriate, and covers more of the uses of should  than mine does.

  - A.

  
New2grammar  #514089  Thu, 15 May 08 05:11 PM

I believe is the it-seems-to-me element; should is the it-is-advisable element.  The it-is-advisable element is missing from the first two sentences.

 

This totally answers the question. Thanks, CJ. Actually Avangi's reply led me in this direction and I felt the difference and your reply states explicitly states it. Great!

  
CalifJim  #514092  Thu, 15 May 08 05:15 PM
 I believe you should get a gold star for learning something new!

CJ 

  
New2grammar  #514099  Thu, 15 May 08 05:32 PM
I don't quite understand your comment (This time I understand the believe...should part but not the rest :) )
I believe it's for me and it sounds like a compliment. Either way, I'll take it as a compliment Stick out tongue

Somehow, gold star throws me off. In my culture, stars are always good things.

 

  
Avangi  #514107  Thu, 15 May 08 05:54 PM

In my culture, when we say a person sees stars, it often means someone just hit him in the head, hard enough to cause him to nearly lose consciousness.  Do you have that also?

Small, bright, colored, sticky paper stars are often applied to the schoolwork papers of children to reward them for excellence.  The gold ones are the best.

  - A.  

  
1 2
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions