If clause question

The first is correct.  It's the typical pattern of if and past tense used with a clause with would.

Many people use the second as well.  There is no real difference in meaning.  I think we can say that it, too, is correct, even though it does not follow the most typical pattern.

CJ

>To be exact, "will" goes with "move".....

Good point.

Hi everyone,
I think that's a mixed conditional (= half first conditional and half second). It seems it's ok in speaking, and a lot of native speakers use mixed conditional, but I'm always afraid to use them, because I'm afraid to sound unnatural.

If I give you my old car, would you fix it and make a new car out of it?
Well, if George is elected again, I don't know what I would do... If he wins, I would probably hang myself.

I sometimes tend to say sentences like those (especially like the fist one). They are probably not formally ok and they definitley could be said in a better way, but do the sound unnatural? I mean, if someone says those kinds of sentences, would everyone notice their great oddness?

I see, thanks.
You said at least a little odd... I think they could sound odd in writing, because you read them slowly, but I think that in normal speech, those mixed conditional are really found. The "standard" versions sound best, but in speech often you don't have time to plan the way you are going to say your sentences...