[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Sat, Aug 5 2006 5:55 PM by Inchoateknowledge. 6 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Inchoateknowledge  +  252671 Sat, 05 Aug 06 11:20 AM
I would have come if only you had rung me.
Can if only be used this way? Strange.
Or does this sentence mean other than it was my wish you rang me because than I could have come, which/what  I wanted so much.
2nd question: which or what?

Joined on Wed, May 3 2006
Senior Member 2,549
Beep! Beep! :)
Marius Hancu  +  252693 Sat, 05 Aug 06 12:17 PM
I would have come if only you had rung me.

This is correct, but it means something else:

You just had to call me, and I would have come. (But you didn't call.)

or in a modified version of your interpretation:

I wish you had rung me, then I would have come. (You didn't call.)

Or in other words:
The only condition for my arrival was that you had called me.


Joined on Wed, Apr 26 2006
Veteran Member 11,673
Pastsimple, 3 yr 113 days ago
Answer to the second question: definitely which. What doesn't make sense here at all.


Inchoateknowledge, 3 yr 113 days ago
Thanks. I got it now.
Inchoateknowledge  +  252718 Sat, 05 Aug 06 01:07 PM
 Pastsimple wrote:
Answer to the second question: definitely which. What doesn't make sense here at all.






What I must do is write a letter (correct) = Write a letter is what I must do (correct) = I could have come, what  I wanted so much.
I see analogy between the two examples.


Cool Breeze  +  252796 Sat, 05 Aug 06 05:05 PM
 Inchoateknowledge wrote:
 Pastsimple wrote:
Answer to the second question: definitely which. What doesn't make sense here at all.






What I must do is write a letter (correct) = Write a letter is what I must do (correct) = I could have come, what  I wanted so much.
I see analogy between the two examples.



Hi Inchoateknowledge

What I must do is write a letter. (OK)
What I must do is to write a letter.  (OK)
Write a letter is what I must do. (wrong)
To write a letter is what I must do. (OK, very formal)
Writing a letter is what I must do. (OK)

I could have come, which I wanted so much. (The antecedent is the entire main clause.)

Both the full infinitive (to hear) and the gerund (hearing) can be the subject of a clause:
To hear him sing is an unforgettable experience.
Hearing him sing is...

People usually say it with a preparatory it:
It's an unforgettable experience to hear him sing.

Cheers
CB
Joined on Fri, Apr 7 2006
Senior Member 3,979
"I hope you'll all live to be 150 years old - and the last voice you hear is mine!" Frank Sinatra on stage in Oslo, Norway, 28 September 1991
Inchoateknowledge, 3 yr 112 days ago
I see
thx


© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3615.39139. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.